Do Mandatory Masks and Vaccines Break the 10 Points of the Nuremberg Code?


The Nuremberg Code was created as an ethical benchmark to protect against medical experimentation. Do mandatory masks and vaccines break it?

Mandatory masks

continue to be the standard operating procedure for many counties, regions, districts, states and nations worldwide, as the COVID cult agenda progresses. In many places, while COVID vaccines are not yet mandatory, authorities are rushing to prepare to make them so, by setting up schemes like immunity passports, vaccine certificates and mandatory tracking databases which log who has taken the shot and who has not. Meanwhile, inherent sovereign human rights are being limited to those who acquiesce to tkae the shot. The insanity and absurdity of the COVID cult is all the more apparent when you realize that its mandatory or quasi-mandatory rules stand in contradiction to a very important set of principles decided upon in 1947. I refer to the Nuremberg Code, the set of 10 points that arose from the infamous Nuremberg Trials conducted in the aftermath of World War II. I am not passing judgement on how impartial those trials were, because I know they were mainly run by the US and the Allies (as the victors), who for obvious reasons did not press charges against American generals such as Eisenhower (who later became US President) for his POW camps inside of Germany and carpet-bombing of Dresden. Nonetheless, the trials produced the Nuremburg Code which enshrined the principle of informed consent – a principle which, in the advent of the COVID scamdemic, is now highly relevant and is continually being put to the test. This article will look briefly at each of the 10 points in the light of COVID restrictions and rules.

The 10 Points of the Code

This website gives a brief history of how the 10 points of the Nuremberg Code came into existence. Interestingly, although the code is an international ethical landmark, it is apparently still not enshrined in American or German national law. We must assume those governments via their secret agencies like the CIA wanted to keep the door open to conduct medical experimentation (such as bioweapon programs like weaponized ticks) upon their citizenry without technically breaking the law:

“On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal in the case of the USA vs. Karl Brandt et. al. delivered their verdict. Before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult question of medical experimentation on human beings. Several German doctors had argued in their own defense that their experiments differed little from previous American or German ones. Furthermore they showed that no international law or informal statement differentiated between legal and illegal human experimentation. This argument worried Drs. Andrew Ivy and Leo Alexander, American doctors who had worked with the prosecution during the trial. On April 17, 1947, Dr. Alexander submitted a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes which outlined six points defining legitimate research. The verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a section entitled “Permissible Medical Experiments” and revised the original six points into ten. Subsequently, the ten points became known as the “Nuremberg Code.” Although the code addressed the defense arguments in general, remarkably none of the specific findings against Brandt and his codefendants mentioned the code. Thus the legal force of the document was not well established. The uncertain use of the code continued in the half century following the trial when it informed numerous international ethics statements but failed to find a place in either the American or German national law codes. Nevertheless, it remains a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasting products of the “Doctors Trial.””

Nuremberg Code #1: Voluntary Consent is Essential

The first point of the Code is:

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.”

This point has already been broken many times over just with the introduction of mandatory masks alone. In the US, for example, masks are defined in several places as “medical devices” according to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). The first piece of evidence is on the FDA’s website itself at this page that discusses masks and which is nested under the category Medical Devices as follows:

“Home / Medical Devices / Products and Medical Procedures / General Hospital Devices and Supplies / Personal Protective Equipment for Infection Control / N95 Respirators, Surgical Masks, and Face Masks”

The second piece of evidence is in the law: the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) which is US federal law enacted by Congress. It and other federal laws establish the legal framework within which FDA operates. The FD&C Act can be found in the United States Code (USC), which contains all general and permanent US laws, beginning at 21 USC 301. You can read it here. Look under Chapter II Definitions (pg.3) and scroll down to Section 201(h):

“(h) The term “device” (except when used in paragraph (n) of this section and in sections 301(i), 403(f), 502(c), and 602(c)) means an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory, which is — (1) recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopeia, or any supplement to them, (2) intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or (3) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of its primary intended purposes.”

Under this section, a mask meets the criteria required for being designated as a medical device, since it meets point (2), being an apparatus which is intended to prevent disease.

Did any politician ask the people of the world whether they wanted to wear masks and volunteer themselves to wear medical devices? No. There has been no voluntary or informed consent.

Nuremberg Code #2: Yield Fruitful Results Unprocurable By Other Means

The second point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.”

We have to face reality that COVID measures such as mandatory masks or vaccines are a giant medical experiment. Many people have been suffering the ill effects of under-oxygenation due to prolonged mask wearing. The untested vaccines constitute the biggest worldwide experiment in human history, having been rushed to market in under 12 months when vaccines usually take 7-20 years to develop. As covered in previous articles, these so-called vaccines (actually mRNA devices) were not designed to stop transmission, elicit a direct immune response (as traditional vaccines do) nor to stop moderate to severe symptoms, so their risk-to- benefit ratio is massively high. Cloth masks made of bandannas and rags are utterly “random and unnecessary in nature.” Meanwhile, there are many other ways to produce “fruitful results” for society without this experimentation: educating people about the principles of natural health, boosting the immune system naturally and even supplementing with vitamin D (research has shown a connection between those acquiring COVID and vitamin D deficiency).

Nuremberg Code #3: Base Experiments on Results of Animal Experimentation and Natural History of Disease

The third point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.”

This point has also been broken. Big Pharma companies skipped animal trials in their rush to get their “vaccines” to market.

Nuremberg Code #4: Avoid All Unnecessary Suffering and Injury

The fourth point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.”

None of the masks and “vaccines” (which indisutably cause suffering, injury and death) are necessary for many reasons:

– the COVID case and death count has been wildly inflated from the beginning;

– COVID is a repackaging scheme which reclassifies existing diseases to create the appearane of a new deadly disease and pandemic when there is none. See the work of people such as Dr. Genevieve Briand;

– the alleged novel virus SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, purified and proven 100% to exist.

Nuremberg Code #5: No Experiment to be Conducted if There’s Reason to Think Injury or Death Will Occur

The fifth point of the Code is:

“No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.”

Is there an a priori reason to believe disabling injury or death will occur from the COVID not-vaccines? Given the past history of vacine injury, yes there is. Around 2 weeks ago on January 29th 2021, the CDC reported over 11,000 adverse reactions to the COVID vaccine, including 501 deaths and 10,748 other injuries, some of which were indeed disabling injuries. If you are not fainthearted, see these video clips and compilations (here, here, here and here) which show the horrible side effects of the vax.

Nuremberg Code #6: Risk Should Never Exceed the Benefit

The sixth point of the Code is:

“The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.”

From Big Pharma’s point of view, the risk doesn’t exceed the benefit. They are shielded from legal liability thanks to the 1986 NCVIA and other preparatory laws like the 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act which paved the way for Big Pharma legal immunity. There’s no risk, and the profits are astronomical. For the average individual, on the other hand, the situation is exactly the reverse; there’s no benefit to taking a non-vaccine which doesn’t protect you from severe symptoms and which doesn’t stop transmission, but which could lead to serious and debilitating effects like paralysis and death.

Nuremberg Code #7: Preparation Must Be Made Against Even Remote Possibility of Injury, Disability or Death

The seventh point of the Code is:

“Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.”

No preparations have been made! The COVID vaccines are a giant worldwide human experiment, and every single participant is the equivalent of a human hamster or guinea pig. If you die, bad luck! Big Pharma will be sure to roll out their legal and PR departments and immediately question the connection bewteen their vax and your death. They will never, ever admit a connection, and even if they did, there are no legal consequences for them. There is no recourse.

Nuremberg Code #8: Experiment Must Be Conducted by Scientifically Qualified Persons

The eighth point of the Code is:

“The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.”

Doctors such as Dr. Stefan Lanka and Dr. Tom Cowan who challenge the mainstream narrative of virology – namely that contagious viruses exist and can infect you – would most certainly dispute that career bureaucrats like Dr. Anthony Fauci and Big Pharma scientists are truly qualified, but even if you accept that they are, the scientists that make the vaccines are not the ones administering them. It’s the regular nurses and doctors who are doing that. How many of them truly know what the non-vaccine is, what it does, the complete list of its ingredients and the full list of its long-term side effects? No one knows the latter, precisely because this is a giant experiment.

By creating unlawful mask mandates, politicians are playing doctor, putting themselves in the position of being medical experts by dictating health directives and medical interventions to the entire population. The people have not given consent for politicians, who are medically untrained, to act as their personal physicians.

Nuremberg Code #9: Anyone Must Have the Freedom to Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time

The ninth point of the Code is:

“During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.”

Do you have the right to bring the insane COVID cult medical experimentation to an end? Of course you don’t! People are being discriminated against for not wearing masks by being deprived of their rights to freely travel, trade and work. People are being threatened with fines and prison for not wearing masks. People’s rights are being violated when they exercise their right to make thier own medical decisions by refusing the vax. There is no freedom for the COVID subject who is being experimented upon.

Nuremberg Code #10: The Scientist Must Bring the Experiment to an End At Any Time if There’s Probable Cause of it Resulting in Injury or Death

The tenth point of the Code is:

“During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.”

This point includes the phrase “probable cause” which is probably well-known to many people, especially Americans, since it is enshrined in the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution that protects people against searches and seizures unless the police have a warrant based on probable cause that that person has a committed a crime. Probable cause is legally considered to be a higher standard than “reasonable belief” or “reasonable suspicion” which is the wording used in other jurisdictions. Regardless, do you think any Big Pharma company has EVER voluntarily halted their vaccine rollout because of their “superior skill and careful judgment” that they might be harming people? No way! The profits are too great, and their line of defense is that some people may be injured or killed by the vaccines, but it’s all for the “greater good” of protecting society. As Martin Luther King said, Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”


Society is regressing right now. We are giving up hard-fought rights and freedoms out of fear. Collectively, we are forgetting that we have already long ago established fundamental human rights such as bodily autonomy, medical sovereignty and informed, voluntary consent. The Nuremberg Code is a stark reminder that we have been through all this before, and got through it to crystallize the lessons learned. We must remember Who We Are and stop this insane COVID medical experimentation – before it’s too late.


Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at Makia is on Steemit and Parler.




















Todd Burgess February 12, 2021 - 11:34 am

When legalese comes into play, the chicanery will be rampant.
The language used in the definitions is meant to confuse and obscure, painting grey areas where nefarious deeds may hide and be “legal”.
Yes, they break every one of the codes, but who will hold their feet to the fire?

Sharine Borslien February 12, 2021 - 11:15 pm

Todd, I’m doing what I can to hold their feet to the fire! I have filed Notice of Discrimination Incident Reports at Trader Joe’s and our new local health (ugh) food store, which of course I filed with the US Dept of Justice, Civil Rights Division. I sent letters to our city council demanding that they refuse to encourage the cruel “mandates” and ask the Sheriff to not enforce them. I also sent a long letter to Trader Joe’s general counsel, detailing all the egregious abuses of California and US law and human rights and demanding immediate redress. Instead, TJ’s outdoor info sign was updated to state that the reason they are enforcing face mask wearing is “due to limited capacity.” Of WHAT? Their brains? I will be writing to their legal counsel about this illogical signage. I am also writing comments and my own posts on to inspire readers/writers to question this plandemic (although most of them reply with “you’re demented” or “you are the problem!”). Meanwhile, I’m working to stay creative and bring joy to the world, as the controllers hate us for our creative (they have none) and I want to drive their sorry asses OUT of power.

Shawn March 16, 2021 - 10:43 am

Don’t wait outside in line, and walk in the store without a mask. They will possibly call the police. If the police confront you have a statement prepared in writing and read it:

“I have an inalienable natural right to life which includes the right to acquire the necessities to support life, and the right to noninterference with normal bodily processes. This business is a place of public accommodation, so I can’t trespass on its premises. The Constitution of the United States provides that states WILL have a republican form of government. Among other things this includes the separation of powers which means that only legislators can enact law. A business is not a legislature and neither is a governor. If you unlawfully arrest me, you will be sued in federal court for acting under color of law, and you will be committing a mortal sin which merits HELL.”

Have someone with a mask on take a video, and post it online. Then enjoying watching TSHTF.

Nothing above is immoral.

They can’t charge you for trespassing because the business serves the public. This is obvious because there is an open door, and one doesn’t need a membership to shop at the store. Even a membership is of doubtful morality.

Sharine Borslien March 16, 2021 - 1:48 pm

Thank you, Shawn!

I copied and lightly edited your excellent statement, and will muster the courage to visit the health food store first!

Stay strong and stay FREE!

Shawn March 16, 2021 - 8:40 pm

I would like to publicly note that for some reason it took more than three hours to receive a notification concerning your post in my email inbox. One hopes that there isn’t foul play.

Sharine Borslien March 17, 2021 - 1:05 am

Wow. That’s a long time period, considering that internet communication happens in split-seconds! Highly suspicious, but then, so is anything with the internet these days. I just received a frightening email message from some dude claiming to know one of my passwords (it is accurate) and he is trying to extort me. Life gets weirder every day. Stay safe, stay strong, and stay FREE!

Ann May 2, 2021 - 8:51 am

What have been your results of using this? Since the beginning, I’ve printed out the CDC (not that I validate them personally) and the stores mask exemptions when possible and I carry them into the store. I show them when approached and don’t say a word that 99% of the time the employee leaves me. There are of course very low IQ employees, who just blindly scream the “rules” and I leave because they’re not going to ring me up anyway. I’ve reported violators to the DOJ and never receive anything back.

Shawn May 2, 2021 - 10:47 am

I haven’t used it because of fortunate circumstances.

There actually is a better method. Technically refusal to do business with someone amounts to theft. A person is depriving another of property – goods or services. You could allege to the police that you are being stolen from.

If they don’t ring you up, you can call the police and follow the procedure in the immediately above paragraph or promise to pay later and walk out without paying. There typically is some kind of reasonable circumstances exception to the crime of theft, so you should be able to take the goods with a promise to pay later.

BDBinc February 23, 2021 - 11:47 am
Todd Burgess February 23, 2021 - 8:49 pm

That would expose the fraud of it all, so I figure it to be controlled opposition.
We can protest all day/year/decade long and sign a bajillion petitions, but THEY know the ONLY way to remove them, the parasites that they are, is by force. Only when enough people become aware to this fact will the tide turn, if ever.

BDBinc February 23, 2021 - 9:08 pm

Saying there is no ” sars cov2 virus” is not controlled opposition its the destruction of the very base of the fraud.
The globalists love civil wars and chaos,at best while you remove a few of their tools by force they get other tools the same violent thugs that got rid of their last tools are the new tools..

Violence never solves violence.

All you have to do is look at the war on drugs, terror and now racism- increases it.

This is our inner collective state manifesting you don’t and cant solve unconsciousness by more unconsciousness.
Awareness is key, not violence.The petition spreads awareness of the covid fraud.

pjproudify . February 13, 2021 - 2:15 pm

With ALL due respect to all of you freedom fighters out there, there is one important factor that makes me say “Hmmmmm.” I am certain, based upon the obviously high level of your intelligence, strength and integrity, that you all realize that we were sold out to the Rothchilds’ by Congress in 1871, and that the organic Constitution of the US was thrown out. Why, then, do we all continue to fight for “our freedom?” Is not Donald Trump a 33rd Degree Freemason, assuring the American people that the Covid-19 vaccine is safe and effective? Has it not been proven, time and time again’ that all of the “elected” politicians of the US are merely serving the Corporation of Washington DC and not the people? With this knowledge, I have realized that I have been a slave my whole life. However, I have also realized that I have been one of the happiest, most fulfilled slaves of all time. Therefore, knowing what I know now, I am putting my faith in God only. I will endure the things that I can not change with dignity, forgiveness and grace.

By the way, the article that you posted about “Q” being bullshit is SPOT ON!!! The followers of Q are, unfortunately, frogs in a cauldron of water on slow simmer.

Also, if Trump is who I think he is, he will be given power to continue his reign for 42 months. God help us.

Bill Sanders February 14, 2021 - 4:47 pm

I find it ironic that you have full faith in the God of the Bible – despite the many contradictions contained therein – yet have no faith in the Q plan. It occurred to me that I have some faith in the Q plan for the exact same reasons I have some faith in God. Namely, because there is SOME evidence for both. I could be wrong about both. But that okay. Because I am not a nihilist, I choose to be hopeful. Thank you for “all due respect.”

Junious Ricardo Stanton February 14, 2021 - 11:31 am

Thank you for posting this valuable and vital information. Sadly very few people are familiar with the Nuremburg Code or that we have a legal and moral right to resist and refuse experimental drugs, injections, surgery or mutilation..

Tim Kennedy February 17, 2021 - 5:45 pm

Didn’t read the article. It doesn’t matter, Nuremburg was just show trial. The “winners” write and fabricate the “history”.

Stay asleep if you must…

This world is not at all as it has seemed… it becomes obvious,, it’s just a different day, a different decade, same shit dressed differently.
The Truth Sets Us Free.

Jen Werner May 3, 2021 - 1:52 am
Suki49 February 18, 2021 - 10:08 am

They’ve got to change the antiquated and backward idea of animal experiments producing positive results for human health. I’ve studied and written about vaccines extensively over the past 40 years. There is a lot of smoke and mirrors involved regarding them playing any role in ending or preventing epidemics. Animal “tests” are used. as the excuse to release toxins, and serve as the straw man defense for the industries who are poisoning us. So, it’s not about protecting people, it’s about setting up a liability shield for themselves.

I would hope there is a glimmer of moral and ethical considerations, too. Literal torture occurs in vivisection labs. None of it is necessary, and it is often severely counterproductive. It strikes me as being very strange that we can be offended and outraged over violence and torture of our own kind, but so blasé’ about what we do to other sentient beings. It seems we still have a way to go in order to become enlightened.

As far as the “value” of it to our selfish ends, however, here is one of the many books written about why it is a dangerous practice to apply to people. The reason the public doesn’t hear about it is because of the same censorship and propaganda surrounding vaccines – it’s grown into a hugely profitable industry which is heavily intertwined with other predacious commercial interests..Billions of tax dollars also wasted.

The author, Prof. Pietro Croce, M.D., is a former vivisector.

Vivisection or Science, A Choice to Make

CATRYNA49 March 3, 2021 - 9:48 am

“Do Mandatory Masks and Vaccines Break the 10 Points of the Nuremburg Code?”

Indeed, they do in every way possible. Evil people once again dealing death blows to mankind. They are truly Satan’s own.

Shawn March 16, 2021 - 10:54 am

This is good – if not perfect – article. The sources would be best tied into the article using super scripted numbers as is typical of academic writing.

However, it must be noted that technically the Nuremberg Code hasn’t been adopted as law in most jurisdictions (AFAIK). That said, it is a just and international standard of ethics, and so it should be enforceable in court.

Jen Werner May 3, 2021 - 2:02 am

The Nuremburg Code is bollocks! There were NO experiments done on Concentration Camp inmates. That was pure and utter garbage falsehoods from the jews. And that is why no one adheres to them b/c the code was based under false pretenses for crimes the Germans never ever committed. The jews owe Germany an apology.

Shawn May 3, 2021 - 12:03 pm

I am inclined to believe this, but where is the proof? I don’t believe in the Holohoax, but certainly there is some truth in the narrative, and the Nazis did wrong the Jews – even if not as propaganda would have it.

Post Comment