10 Reasons that SARS-CoV-2 Is an Imaginary and Theoretical Virus

Share

Lots of A, T, C and G: SARS-CoV-2 fueled the COVID scamdemic, yet to this day has never been isolated, remaining a digital, in silico, imaginary and theoretical virus.

The Imaginary and Theoretical Virus

known as SARS-CoV-2, a concept which has been used by the NWO (New World Order) controllers to shut down the world, is becoming more and more exposed as the months go by. Although those who believe in the COVID cult – both those orchestrating the scamdemic and those blindly following along – will insist the virus is real, the truth is that there has still been no compelling or conclusive evidence that a real SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. Admissions by governmental scientists and organizations worldwide, as well as omissions and obfuscations by those same people and agencies, reveal the shocking truth. As hard as it may be for the COVID cultists to admit, the emperor truly has no clothes. There is no virus, other than a digital, theoretical abstraction made on a computer from a genomic database. The virus has never been isolated, purified, sequenced, characterized and proven 100% to exist. Don’t believe it? That’s okay; it’s good to be skeptical. See the evidence below for yourself and make up your own mind.

#1 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: The Virus Has Never Been Isolated According to Koch’s Postulates or River’s Postulates

We’ll start with this, because this is the cornerstone of the whole scam. All the following information and evidence below stems from the fact the so-called experts have never isolated and purified the virus according to the gold standard of Koch’s postulates, or even the modified River’s Postulates. Koch’s postulates are:

  1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
  2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.
  3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must cause disease.
  4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.

River’s postulates were proposed by Thomas M. River in 1973 to establish the role of a specific virus as the cause of a specific disease. They are modifications of Koch’s postulates. They are as follows:

  1. The viral agent must be found either in the host’s (animal or plant) body fluids at the time of disease or in cells showing lesions specific to that disease.
  2. The host material with the viral agent used to inoculate the healthy host (test organism) must be free of any other microorganism.
  3. The viral agent obtained from the infected host must produce the specific disease in a suitable healthy host, and/or provide evidence of infection by inducing the formation of antibodies specific to that agent.
  4. Similar material (viral particle) from the newly infected host (test organism) must be isolated and capable of transmitting the specific disease to other healthy hosts.

Whichever set of postulates is used, SARS-CoV-2 fails the test. Dr. Andrew Kaufman does a great job explaining why in this video. The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be present only in sick people and not in healthy ones. The virus has never been isolated, which must be done with proper equipment such as electron microscopes and which cannot be achieved through CT scans (as the Chinese were using) and the flawed PCR test. The January 24th 2020 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 describes how the scientists arrived at the idea of COVID-19: they took lung fluid samples and extracted RNA from them using the PCR test. It admits that the coronavirus failed Koch’s postulates:

“Further development of accurate and rapid methods to identify unknown respiratory pathogens is still needed … our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates.”

#2 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: Top Chinese Scientist Admitted They Never Isolated the Virus

All claims that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated have turned out to be unsubstantiated. Meanwhile, there have been actual admissions by officials that they haven’t isolated it. The chief epidemiologist of the Chinese CDC (Center for Disease Control) Dr. Wu Zunyou admitted “they didn’t isolate the virus” in this video clip.

#3 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: CDC Stated No Quantified Isolate Was Available

The US CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) in its July 2020 report CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel admits that it had been running PCR tests based not on an actual viral isolate (an actual sample or specimen taken from an infected human), but rather “stocks” of “transcribed RNA” taken from a gene bank to “mimic clinical specimen”:

“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.” (pg.43)

#4 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: CDC Admitted They Made a Digital Virus of 30,000 Base Pairs Using 37 Actual Sample Base Pairs

As covered in my previous article SARS-CoV-2: The Stitched Together, Frankenstein Virus, the CDC has already admitted that SARS-CoV-2 is a computer-generated digital virus, not a real living virus. As I wrote:

“In other words, it is a Frankenstein virus which has been concocted and stitched together using genomic database sequences (some viral, some not). It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer database. In this paper, the CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs which means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue. In other words, they took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs. This computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud.”

In this article In June Study CDC Scientists Make 2 COVID Admissions that Destroy Official Narrative I reveal how the CDC admitted in their paper that they extrapolated their make-believe virus. Here is the quote:

“Whole-Genome Sequencing

We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs.”

Another way to say this is that the “virus” has been constructed using a technique called de novo assembly which is a method for constructing genomes from a large number of (short or long) DNA fragments, with no a priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments. You can read more about it here.

#5 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: European Corman-Drosten Paper Used an “In Silico” Genome of an “In Silico” Virus

The original Corman-Drosten paper admits they used a theoretical virus sequence for all their work and calculations. They, like the CDC and every government and agency, claim this is only because no isolate was ever available. I wonder if any of these scientists every asked WHY the isolate has never been available?

“In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community.”

A subsequent study highlighting fatal flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper was published entitled External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results. It highlights how the authors used in silico or theoretical sequences from computer banks, not real isolated samples from infected people. “In silico” is pseudo-Latin for “theoretical”; in plain English, synonyms for theoretical are “imaginary” and “make-believe.”

“The first and major issue is that the novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (in the publication named 2019-nCoV and in February 2020 named SARS-CoV-2 by an international consortium of virus experts) is based on in silico (theoretical) sequences, supplied by a laboratory in China, because at the time neither control material of infectious (“live”) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 nor isolated genomic RNA of the virus was available to the authors. To date no validation has been performed by the authorship based on isolated SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full length RNA thereof.

Nevertheless these in silico sequences were used to develop a RT-PCR test methodology to identify the aforesaid virus. This model was based on the assumption that the novel virus is very similar to SARS-CoV from 2003 (Hereafter named SARS-CoV-1) as both are beta-coronaviruses … in short, a design relying merely on close genetic relatives does not fulfill the aim for a “robust diagnostic test” as cross reactivity and therefore false-positive results will inevitably occur. Validation was only done in regards to in silico (theoretical) sequences and within the laboratory-setting, and not as required for in-vitro diagnostics with isolated genomic viral RNA. This very fact hasn’t changed even after 10 months of introduction of the test into routine diagnostics.”

#6 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: UK Government Couldn’t Produce Evidence

The governments of many nations around the world couldn’t seem to come up with a real virus either when challenged to do so. More evidence proving the “virus” is constructed on a computer database from a digital gene bank comes from Frances Leader, who questioned the UK MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) whether a real isolated virus was used to make the COVID vax (read more about the COVID vaccine which is not a vaccine here). Leader found that the WHO protocols that Pfizer used to produce the mRNA do not appear to identify any nucleotide sequences that are unique to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Leader asked if the “virus” was actually a computer generated genomic sequence, and ultimately the MHRA confirmed they had no real specimen:

“The DNA template does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person.”

In July 2020, a group of concerned academics wrote a letter to the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson in which they asked him to produce independently peer reviewed scientific evidence proving that the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” has been isolated. To date they have not received a reply. Similarly, UK researcher Andrew Johnson made a Freedom of Information Request to Public Health England (PHE). He asked them to provide him with their records describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus to which they responded:

“PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.”

#7 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: Australian Government Couldn’t Produce Evidence

In other Commonwealth nations it’s the exact same story. In Australia scientists from the Doherty Institute falsely announced that they had isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When asked to clarify the scientists said:

“We have short (RNA) sequences from the diagnostic test that can be used in the diagnostic tests.”

Perhaps this is the reason for this disclaimer by the Australian Government:

“The reliability of COVID-19 tests is uncertain due to the limited evidence base…There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available COVID-19 tests.”

#8 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: Canadian Government Couldn’t Produce Evidence

Researcher Christine Massey made a similar Freedom of Information request in Canada, to which the Canadian Government replied:

“Having completed a thorough search, we regret to inform you that we were unable to locate any records responsive to your request.”

#9 SARS-Cov-2 the Theoretical Virus: Over 40 Institutions Worldwide Can’t Answer the Basic Question

In fact, Massey and her colleague in New Zealand “have been submitting Freedom of Information requests to various institutions in Canada, NZ, Australia, Germany, the U.K., the U.S. etc., seeking any records that describe the isolation of a “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”) from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased human … As of December 16, 2020, >40 institutions in Canada, U.S., New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, and the European CDC have provided their responses, and none could locate any record describing the isolation of any “COVID-19 virus” aka “SARS-COV-2” directly from a diseased patient.”

Massey posts their replies here and here.

#10 SARS-Cov-2 the Theoretical Virus: Previous Coronaviruses Have Not Been Isolated

The Spanish health journal Salud published a great article in November 2020 entitled “Frauds and falsehoods in the medical field” where it exposes the lack of evidence not only for the isolation of SARS-CoV-2, but also for the isolation of other past coronaviruses (unofficial translation here). The scam runs deep. Jon Rappoport has done great work exposing how the exact same scam blueprint was played out in the 1980s (with Fauci in charge, leading the fraud) when scientists asserted there was a new virus called HIV, and it was causing AIDS. The COVID scamdemic greatly mimics other historical fake pandemics such as the 1976 swine flu pandemic. The article in Salud states:

“The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”. The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!

We have been warning you since March [2020 – Ed.]: you cannot have specific tests for a virus without knowing the components of the virus you are trying to detect. And the components cannot be known without having previously isolated/purified that virus. Since then we continue to accumulate evidence that no one has isolated SARS-CoV-2 and, more importantly, that it can never be isolated … In this report we are going to add the results of a particular research we have done from the data published on the alleged SARS-CoV-2 and on the protocols endorsed by the WHO for the use of RT-PCR as well as the data corresponding to the rest of the “human coronaviruses”. And the conclusions are extremely serious: none of the seven “human coronaviruses” have actually been isolated and all the sequences of the primers of their respective PCRs as well as those of a large number of fragments of their supposed genomes are found in different areas of the human genome and in genomes of bacteria and archaea …”

Their report analyzed human coronaviruses 229E (said to have been isolated in 1965), OC43 (in 1967), SARS-CoV (in 2003), NL63 (in 2004), HKU1 (in 2005) and MERS-CoV (in 2012). And just to repeat in case you missed it: they discovered the alleged sequences of SARS-CoV-2 are found in both humans and bacteria! This means all the various in silico models of SARS-CoV-2 contain existing human genetic sequences, so it is little wonder that people test positive when the primer or standard being tested against contains human sequences.

Conclusion: The COVID Cult is a Colossal Fraud and Superstition

How did this all start? Chinese scientists took lung fluid samples and claimed they had discovered a novel or new virus. The Gates-Rockefeller WHO backed them up. In the WHO’s Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCov Situation Report 1, they state:

“The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus, which was isolated on 7 January 2020……On 12 January 2020, China shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus for countries to use in developing specific diagnostic kits.”

With the evidence presented above, the WHO’s assertions and claims are utterly baseless. They constitute outright fraud. The world has been shut down over a lie – a coldly calculated, carefully curated lie – that was simulated and war-gamed for decades in advance. The COVID cult is an irrational superstition based on nothing but in silico, theoretical, make-believe viral sequences. Yet, the real-world consequences for millions who have been thrown into stress, despair, poverty, joblessness, alcoholism and suicide is anything but theoretical.

*****

Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and Parler.

Sources:

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/

*https://paramedicsworld.com/virology-notes/introduction-to-virology-rivers-postulates/medical-paramedical-studynotes

*https://www.bitchute.com/video/eOGvhrGTVq6N/

*https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

*https://twitter.com/EEccetera/status/1354208913315528705

*https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/sars-cov-2-stitched-together-frankenstein-virus/

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-admissions-cdc-scientists-accidentally-destroy-official-narrative/

*https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

*https://thesequencingcenter.com/knowledge-base/de-novo-assembly/

*https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045

*https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346483715_External_peer_review_of_the_RTPCR_test_to_detect_SARS-CoV-2_reveals_10_major_scientific_flaws_at_the_molecular_and_methodological_level_consequences_for_false_positive_results

*https://hive.blog/worldnews/@francesleader/email-exchange-with-uk-mhra-exposing-the-genomic-sequence-of-sarscov2

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/not-a-vaccine-mrna-covid-vaccine-chemical-pathogen-device/

*https://www.resetourplanet.com/covid19-something-real-or-fake-what-do-we-know/

*https://cvpandemicinvestigation.com/2020/09/covid-19-evidence-of-fraud-medical-malpractice-acts-of-domestic-terrorism-and-breaches-of-human-rights/#_Toc56846502

*https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/679566/response/1625332/attach/html/2/872%20FOI%20All%20records%20describing%20isolation%20of%20SARS%20COV%202.pdf.html

*https://www.doherty.edu.au/people

*https://twitter.com/TheDohertyInst/status/1222345640769777671

*https://www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-testing-australia-information-health-professionals

*https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Health-Canada-FinalResponse-A-2020-00208-2020-06-13.pdf

*https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/FOI-and-formal-responses-re-covid19-virus-isolation-purification-from-19-institutions-Oct-10-2020.pdf

*https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

*https://ia801704.us.archive.org/6/items/the-scam-has-been-confirmed-pcr-does-not-detect-sars-cov-2/The%20scam%20has%20been%20confirmed%20-%20Dsalud%20November%202020.pdf

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/same-fake-pandemic-similarities-1976-swine-flu-2020-covid/

*https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330760/nCoVsitrep21Jan2020-eng.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

*https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/

33 Comments

bobrsta January 28, 2021 - 9:44 pm

What are people dying of, then? Even if one takes the 6% discounted “only covid was present” deaths as the actual number of deaths not attributable to other causes, what is killing those 6%?

Maggie Connor January 29, 2021 - 8:38 am

Not sure, yet i have a friend whose daughter went surfing, one hour later she got a call her daughter was dead – cause of death – covid. Daughter was perfectly healthy, feeling fine, went surfing, hit head, fell off board, drowned. Hospital said covid death. Dr. said covid death. True story. So you tell me . . . whgat do you suppose that is about? $$$

Lynn January 29, 2021 - 9:29 am

Look it up. Flu deaths have become practically nonexistent. Deaths from all causes has not changed in 2021 as compared to previous years. The statistics you site are fake numbers based on the debunked PCR test. The establishment has been doing everything it can to “create” this pandemic. To answer your question, the reclassification of the cause of death, e.g. surfing accident. Don’t jump to automatically believing what the authorities and media tell us.

Junious Ricardo Stanton January 29, 2021 - 6:50 pm

Some people are dying because they are in poor health from their unhealthy “lifestyles”, from over the counter drugs, prescribed pharmaceuticals etc. Some young people who vap are at high risk have died, as have people with respiratory conditions like asthma and COPD and other comorbidities like: cardiovascular disease ,dementia, diabetes, compromised and weakened immune systems and low vitality of their life energy. (old age). Don’t believe the hype the recovery rate is almost 98% in non high risk demographics. (people from 0- 75 years of age). .https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Beema January 29, 2021 - 7:59 am

Why are we being lied to on every front regarding this. What is the end game,I don’t believe this virus exists and if anything is a nasty flu virus. It does indeed point to The Great Reset and this flu season has given the World Economic Forum an opportunity not to be missed to start the process of bringing in the NWO. These lockdowns are doing exactly that,

Todd Burgess January 29, 2021 - 10:35 am

Yes, but masks will remain, forever. :-

Daniel Miner January 29, 2021 - 10:57 am

Here is a link to a scientist and statistician who debunked the number of cases, especially the 400,000 the Biden administration is lying about.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/01/25/have-400000-americans-died-of-covid-19/?fbclid=IwAR32j7hv6857mSzF-Af2K_1doD31PEozegzZd98Armvgcr4Ah9nGch94J_I

Our neighbor contacted covid or so he believes and was sick for days. He always wore his mask, distanced himself, and not sure if he took nutrition to help himself, but for 3 days he was delirious and had no memory of anything and finally prayed to God to either heal him or take him. He was healed and when he woke up he was amazed at how his home looked, a mess!! He is a neatnick.

However, he works at Verizon as a salesman and is in constant bombardment by cell phones, wi-fi, and maybe even 5G, because they are starting to roll it out here.

Dr. Martin Pall has written about the effects of 5G or EMFs in general which will debilitate our people, causing them breathing problems, cell death and much more.

Also, if they can “thought project” hot flashes as both my late husband and I experienced for a short time, and which during that time there was a medicine or vaccine produced to stop hot flashes, then perhaps this covid is something they can thought project wherever they want.

Brian the dog January 29, 2021 - 3:22 pm

Even after filtering out the bullshit “Covid deaths” from the official figures there is however a statistically significant uptick in excess mortality rates in several countries, so there is in my view some type of new illness about

R J February 2, 2021 - 12:12 am

Yes, the “new illness” is called the common cold. Oh Nos!

hurricanes May 17, 2021 - 6:34 pm

“statistically significant uptick in excess mortality rate”

Not really, total global deaths have been growing since around 1980. 2020 death toll fits within the trend.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/number-of-deaths-per-year?country=~OWID_WRL

Brian the dog May 18, 2021 - 7:09 am

That number would need to be converted into a rate to be able to see if it was significant. It might be.

Euromomo.eu is fairly reliable for the EU countries I think. More meaningful than our world in data.

BTD

Lynn January 29, 2021 - 9:39 am

Back in the 20th century it was considerably easier for the establishment to sell its lies. Hoaxes were almost effortlessly sold to and bought by the public, regardless of how sloppily they were deployed. Nowadays it seems there’s a growing segment of the population that insists on questioning everything. They no longer accept what they’re told at face value. Oh how the controlling elite must pine for the good’ol days, eh?

Junious Ricardo Stanton January 29, 2021 - 6:50 pm

One of the take-aways from this article is the similarity between the SARS-CoV-2 money making scam, the HIV AIDS scam and the roles Anthony Fauci plays in both.

haroldburbank January 29, 2021 - 12:10 pm

call dr frances boyle, U IL law school, champagne-urbana, who will argue-confirm at least 3 sources have analyzed the full c19 genome as a bioweapon – a chinese scientist who was disappeared, a group of indian scientists who ID’d HIV nano particles as part of the weapon and were forced to recant, and a woman hong kong scientist who has been censored by all but russia. many experts know the ‘agent’ at issue is a bioweapon, not a virus per se. ask usaf lt general thomas mcinirney [ret], who said so publicly weeks ago. not only is the full genome known but has been given ‘gain of function’ for war purposes for years. sadly it has been used instead to make war on the entire species at once and as frank boyle says never should have been made under current law at all.

natalini daniel January 30, 2021 - 7:52 am

January 2020

With the whole viral genome of coronavirus 2019-nCoV having recently been sequenced at the Institut Pasteur, the isolation of strains of coronavirus 2019-nCoV detected in France has now been successfully finalized, in a very short space of time, using the samples taken from the first confirmed French cases.

Junious Ricardo Stanton January 30, 2021 - 1:36 pm

Keep in mind we are in a propaganda war. When Makia Freeman, Jon Rappaport and others share the fact there is no isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus, the other side meaning Fauci ,Gates, CDC, WHO, Johns Hopkins University and their minions are forced to up the ante on their lies. I saw a recent article that said Koch’s (and by extension River’s) Postulates weren’t important or relevant for COVID. What we are seeing in real time is application of the recommendations of the October 2019 preparation simulation called Event 201 especially recommendation #7 https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/recommendations.html regarding the narrative management of this scam .

natalini daniel January 31, 2021 - 1:06 pm

i keep this fact in mind but this story of isolated virus retain my attention. as exemple, the pr Raoult ihu Marseille use to sequence the genome from his patient for detect new mutation, the Pasteur institut have a patent on that, they even gave a name, COVID 19 ! that is blury anyway.

sean ryan January 31, 2021 - 10:29 am

Keep in mind that propaganda runs in at least two directions.
A mere dissent to propaganda or false info is not necessarily the truth.
There is often a truth behind or besides the often two polarized opposing sides.

Most of this entire article is complete & utter nonsense (as outlined further below), and just distracts from larger issues & questions regarding & underlining the “covid” event.

Folks like Makia Freeman or Rappaport on NOT experts on the subject, nor do they provide objective viewpoints.
They often completely fail to provide reliable data, info & evidence.
And example can be found in this “article”, regarding the response by the UK’s PHE, where a single quote is extracted & used to try to make a point, but which ignores the complete response by the PHE, and links containing more info on viral isolation, which provides more complete details as to why these FOI requests can’t be completed, as they are written in ways that make sought info impossible to provide (i.e. viruses need host cells to exist, and thus can’t be completely isolated otherwise they degrade, nor can they be grown without those host cells, thus that “soup” is required to provide an environment for “isolation” and culture).

And, the more you dig into the info provided by this article, and others like it, the more you realize how completely nonsensical, misleading, inadequate or false much of it really is.

Plus, are Freeman & Rappoport willing to submit themselves as test subjects, willing to allow themselves to be infected by the virus, for studies, since they are griping about animals cells being used in that “soup” to enable cultivation (again, some host cells will be required to study viruses).

There is plenty of other info on this topic that people need to more thoroughly explore if they really want more accurate data.

It’s folks like Freeman & Rappoport that give “Conspiracy Theorists” their bad name, bad rep., and distract from more honest info.
And lead more people away from their often misled theories.
Rather than just mindlessly griping, why aren’t these “Investigative Reporters” getting actively involved?
There can be little doubt that people are getting sick, and dying, even if just from the flu. So why isn’t the “brain trust” of “Investigators” finding better treatments or cures for those illnesses & deaths.

A challenge for you:
Do a country by country , year by year comparison of populations versus deaths versus death rates versus births, etc.
Be even more thorough, like even including other factors, like demographics, to account for other possible factors like aging populations.
You’ll see that death rates are up, in many countries.
But you’ll see some other interesting facts & trends that go along with that, like the fact that death rates generally have been going up year after year, for decades or longer.
Why is THAT happening?

In Japan, for example, since the early 2000’s, total deaths have now surpassed total births, thus Japan is actually seeing total population decreases.

Thus a larger question should perhaps be why are deaths rates continuing to increase in many “developed” countries?
And why is “healthcare” largely failing (prior to the “covid” event global corruption in the healthcare industry had become an increasingly concerning topic. As was overuse & negative consequences of the increasing misuses of antibiotics, sterilizers, and such, which are resulting in increased concerns regarding antibiotic resistance)?

Thus there are “truths” coming from both sides, i.e. there have been “excessive” deaths, but it depends on how one defines “excessive”. Are increased deaths this year outside of norms & standard deviations?
There has been no “unadulterated” “isolation” of the virus, but that is not possible to do.
But there are massive failures, inaccuracies, lies, etc. similarly coming from “both” sides.

I am extremely skeptical of the broad “covid” narrative.
It seems to me more a combination of several factors & events (like developments in genome sequencing, which is still quite young, and thus still largely misunderstood, and the continuing unknown complete functions and actions of things like microbes, viruses, and other such).
But sadly the “other” side (folks like Freeman & Rappoport) is providing just as questionable & unreliable info.

I’ve learned to transcend beyond “both” sides, and do my own research, investigation, info gathering & education.
I’ve also engaged in my own personal experiments regarding treatments for illnesses, like the flu (which is related to “covid”), and pneumonia, and such. And have had tremendous successes.
Whereas folks like Freeman & Rappoport are just continuing to provide mindless, inaccurate, even false chatter.
Thus I’m not scared of “covid” or “coronavirus” one bit.

There are over 110 MILLION friggin people in the U.S. alone that are currently NOT working, largely due to quickly & continually escalating deterioration of economic conditions.
Yet seeming few-to-none can engage in more productive activities, rather than just gripe.
Despite the fact many of the most important & groundbreaking beneficial “scientific” & medical” discoveries have been found either by mistake, or by “ordinary” laypersons.
So rather than just mindlessly griping about what others are doing, why aren’t more people working to create more & better solutions to modern problems?

If you were to read more about the topic, outside the very limited info provided by people like Freeman & Rappoport, you would perhaps gain a better understanding as to why both Koch’s and River’s Postulates are insufficient.
Primarily, and again, you can’t simply isolate a virus, free of any other cells.
Plus, the human body is NOT a simple, singular entity. What occurs in one persons body may likely not occur in anothers.
What infects or results in negative consequences in one person may not infect or result in the same negative consequences of another.
Penicillin is a good example. It has been live saving for many, but deadly for others (often via allergic reaction in those others).

The human microbiome is a complicated system that humans still don’t understand, largely because it varies so much from one person to another.
Ditto for viruses, even bacteria & fungi. The Murine Norovirus, for example, previously thought as merely pathogenic, has been demonstrated in numerous studies to perhaps provide quite beneficial actions (seeking to repair highly-compromised immune systems).
Plus, different colonies of species and quantities of different microbes in different bodies result in different reactions to different agents.

But there are so many more important & underlying issues surrounding this “covid” narrative.
Like the fact that numerous Historians, Researchers, Scientists, Nutritionists, and such have noted how decreased crop, food & human nutrition, thus likely highly-compromised immune systems (as the immune system has been tied to nutrition), likely exacerbated the negative consequences of the Black Plague in the Middle Ages.
And the fact we’re dumping more & more toxic sewage sludge on our croplands in contemporary times, as “fertilizer”, leading to negative consequences of the microbes that work to create natural vitamins, natural antibiotics, natural antivirals, natural allelochemicals, and such in our foods.
That are likely highly-compromising & weakening our immune systems.

Or the fact we’re using more & more synthetic fertilizers on our farm & crop lands, which are having many of the same negative consequences, as we’re ignoring the needs of the microbes that again work to create the things (natural vitamins, antibiotics, antivirals, phytochemicals, etc.) necessary for proper nutrition.

Or the fact more natural, nutritious and beneficial foods & ingredients are being replaced by more synthetic, less beneficial foods & ingredients (we have populations that willingly sucking down things like soft drinks, or smoking cigarettes or weed).

Yet we’re busily & ignorantly scratching our heads wondering why populations of humans are largely sickly, frail, weak.

Or perhaps this whole “covid” narrative is just the seeming human inability to come to terms with death.
There is correlation between growing concerns over illness & death to quickly growing aging populations (i.e. as the relatively massive population of “Boomers” continues to get older, and more die, there becomes increased concern due the sheer numbers of aging people facing death).

People like Bill Gates could be “evil”, or perhaps just really scared & unable to come to terms with their pending deaths (quickly growing developments in AI could be a similar symptom of that fear).

What HAS become clear to me, is the massive levels of human ignorance, from most ALL sides.
And the extreme inabilities of people, of “both” sides, to truly engage in more objective, intelligent, and divergent thought processes.
I now see the masses, of “both” sides, largely as just mindless followers.

I see that we are living in the Dark Ages of the 21st Century.
Largely absent or ignorant of greater knowledge.
Mass ignorance being promulgated by “both’ polarized opposing sides.
With truth & greater understanding & knowledge a true casualty.

People like Freeman & Rappoport are AS bad as those they criticize.

TM Green February 3, 2021 - 10:55 am

I agree with most of what you said. I still think there is importance in what these non-experts say. The reality is that there is a fake perception of viruses that officials have knowingly created. Most people are led to believe that the virus isolated ALONE from all other particles, it’s picture taken, the structure is fully formed with nothing missing, the sequence is taken from an observed end to end row of base pairs with no need for modeling. None of that is possible and does not reflect what is happening in reality.

If we are taking the mainstream expert’s explanation of virology seriously then it should be expected that Freeman and Rappoport would come to the conclusion that viruses don’t exist. I think government appointed officials should be blamed for first creating the false perception of viruses that has no evidence or basis in reality which led to these claims of nonexistence. They do not get to completely lie about the practice of virology to the public then get protection from true experts on virology or more knowledgable individuals such as yourself.

R J February 2, 2021 - 12:15 am

“Accomplishing the above goals will require collaboration among governments, international organizations and global business.”

Christian Stormark January 30, 2021 - 3:48 pm

This claim has also been made in Denmark by “Statens Seruminstitut”, but has most likely been suppressed.
Dr Li-Meng Yan has published extremely controversial articles op the CCPvirus. Anybody knows if she published anything on this important matter?

Southern January 31, 2021 - 3:28 am

Brilliant article kudos for the author.

Dhan Hurley January 31, 2021 - 6:50 pm

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-virus-real-has-it-been-photographed.html
Yes, the virus is real. A misleading CDC/FDA document originally written inFebruary but reposted months later stated there was no “quantifiable”sample of SARS-CoV-2 available. While it might have been true in early February, it has been false since then.
Here,CDC tells you how they cultured SARS-CoV-2 and how you can get some–as
long as your institution satisfies stringent criteria. CDC’s discussion of its culture technique was published in its own journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases. The article concludes:……………
This virus has been isolated and fully sequenced 125,000 times in countries around the world, both by poor countries such as Nepal, as well as by richer countries such as South Korea and Australia. The methods are described, sometimes in an accessory file.
A large number of people understandably concluded there was no virus. Perhaps the government agencies that supplied the information from which they drew this conclusion did so cunningly, with the hope to entrap the unwary.
…..a New Zealand microbiology professor explains what took place as a result of poor wording in requests for information.
ome people still clamour that Koch’s Postulates have not been met with SARS-CoV-2–but they were met, as closely as possible,………..
It turns out that some of the early photographs were misinterpretations by their authors
……good pictures of the virus have been taken. For instance, see figure 2 in this paper.

We have been given misinformation about masks, lockdowns, tests, case numbers, deaths, asymptomatic spread, duration of immunity, proper treatment, etc. But there truly is a mean new virus out there. It looks like some nasty features were engineered in.
We have vitamins, minerals, and drugs that can effectively manage the infection, particularly when treated early.
Our governments and health officials have simply done every single thing wrong to manage it, greatly prolonging and worsening the situation.

Dhan Hurley January 31, 2021 - 6:50 pm

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-virus-real-has-it-been-photographed.html
Yes, the virus is real. A misleading CDC/FDA document originally written inFebruary but reposted months later stated there was no “quantifiable”sample of SARS-CoV-2 available. While it might have been true in early February, it has been false since then.
Here,CDC tells you how they cultured SARS-CoV-2 and how you can get some–as
long as your institution satisfies stringent criteria. CDC’s discussion of its culture technique was published in its own journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases. The article concludes:……………
This virus has been isolated and fully sequenced 125,000 times in countries around the world, both by poor countries such as Nepal, as well as by richer countries such as South Korea and Australia. The methods are described, sometimes in an accessory file.
A large number of people understandably concluded there was no virus. Perhaps the government agencies that supplied the information from which they drew this conclusion did so cunningly, with the hope to entrap the unwary.
…..a New Zealand microbiology professor explains what took place as a result of poor wording in requests for information.
ome people still clamour that Koch’s Postulates have not been met with SARS-CoV-2–but they were met, as closely as possible,………..
It turns out that some of the early photographs were misinterpretations by their authors
……good pictures of the virus have been taken. For instance, see figure 2 in this paper.

We have been given misinformation about masks, lockdowns, tests, case numbers, deaths, asymptomatic spread, duration of immunity, proper treatment, etc. But there truly is a mean new virus out there. It looks like some nasty features were engineered in.
We have vitamins, minerals, and drugs that can effectively manage the infection, particularly when treated early.
Our governments and health officials have simply done every single thing wrong to manage it, greatly prolonging and worsening the situation.

Makia Freeman February 2, 2021 - 3:05 pm

They have never truly isolated the virus. All sequences come from a computer genomic database, not from an actual viral sample from an infected person. Any “isolate” is a mixture of chemicals (like antibiotics) where they cannot possibly prove the thing in question is a virus, when there are so many part so the human body (like exosomes) that are basically identical to viruses.

Dhan Hurley February 9, 2021 - 6:12 pm

That is what i thought 6-8 months ago.
M. Nass, M.D. who uncovered the ANTHRAX VACCCINE scandal and stopped it’s use, published the above information on her WEBSITE. I would like an expert to advise on the information given on the site :-

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-virus-real-has-it-been-photographed.html

Dhan Hurley February 9, 2021 - 6:12 pm

That is what i thought 6-8 months ago.
M. Nass, M.D. who uncovered the ANTHRAX VACCCINE scandal and stopped it’s use, published the above information on her WEBSITE. I would like an expert to advise on the information given on the site :-

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-virus-real-has-it-been-photographed.html

Rose Lamothe February 4, 2021 - 1:51 am

Yes, it was isolated long ago and many times since then. Viruses are not identified the same way as bacteria, the Koch postulate for example was formulated long before we knew of the existence of viruses so it cannot be used, here’s how it’s done:
https://openstax.org/books/microbiology/pages/6-3-isolation-culture-and-identification-of-viruses#0

And here are a few examples:The CDC:
”SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html

Isolation, Sequence, Infectivity, and Replication Kinetics of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7454076/

Here’s a list of those isolated in 2020
http://covdb.popgenetics.net/v3/index/searchlist

Alessandro_Machi February 3, 2021 - 11:04 pm

Rather than pontificate on what the Coronavirus is not, tell us what it is. There was something really nasty going around in the fall of 2017-2018 that was DOWNPLAYED by everybody. Is COVID-19 something like what happened in 2017-2018, only much more severe?

Natroy February 7, 2021 - 5:56 am

It does not exist. It’s simple.
http://neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm
The whole propaganda is based on mainly these two things:
1) Focusing on regular deaths and staging fear at something normal;

2) Using some epiphenomena, such as a local increase in death rate in a region of Italy caused by… a previous vaccination campaign.

This is all a scam, and the main crucial information is that pathogenic viruses in particular and germ theory in general are lies. The rest (including the so-called ‘laboratory-made bioweapon’) is diversion, especially on the part of controlled opposition.

timmer121 March 12, 2021 - 9:41 am

all well and good. But what is causing massive illness in the population? my daughters both had ‘covid’ at the same time. is this just another bad flu (like I’ve been saying all along)?

Darko April 8, 2021 - 6:49 pm

Not only that Wu-flu virus does not exist. Virus as a micro organism does not exist. We are being lied to.

Every viral disease is nothing more than the body’s reaction to the toxic blood and its detoxification process.

https://darkovelcek.wordpress.com/2021/01/08/the-virus-is-the-biggest-fraud-of-the-medical-science/

Ermanno April 30, 2021 - 9:52 am

grandissimo come sempre su questo articolo in particolare con questi 10 non solo punti dove produci solo veri documenti e testimonianze di quEsta fantomatica falsa immaginaria, teorica cospirazione pandemica da tutte le 214 nazioni tutte colegate e con gli stessi protocolli da anni, il nostro ministro italiano non oso neanche scrivere il nome perchè di speranza ha ben poco ha usato il copia incolla dei protocolli datati 2006, a proposito non hai menzionato l’italia tra gli stati, nonostante che nel nostro paese ci sia stato il più severo lockdow tra tutti gli stati potevi menzionarlo perchè è stato fin troppo evidente che la nostra nazione è stata la più diligente a servire e collaborare con i dictack cinesi per via che dentro al governo vi è una maggioranza di deputati del “DIMAO 5G”, BASTEREBBERO SOLTANTO LE TUE EVIDENTI PROVE PER ISTITUIRE UN NUOVO TRIBUNALE DI NORIMBERGA 2.0. UN SICERO SALUTO.

Post Comment