The overall Agenda 2030 UNDRIP scheme is a land grab, best summed up by the WEF: “You will own nothing, and you will be happy.” Indigenous people are being used to destroy private property and individual rights. The NWO manipulators controlling the UN don’t care about indigenous people any more than they care about trans people or the environment.
Shownotes:
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles. He is author of the books Break Your Chains and , the book series Controversial Truths Revealed (Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and 40 Incredible Real Life Alien Abductee and Contactee Experiences) and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Rumble, BitChute and Odysee.
3 Comments
ACTS & STATUTS only apply to CORPORATIONS not the live breathing man/woman , unless you give consent they do not have authority to have jurisdiction over the live man/woman FACT This is why they created a CORPORATE Fictional caractor out of our Birth putting our name in all CAPS that is DOG LATTAN a CORPORATION not the liveing man/woman Breaking Free from Corporate Slavery | Pete Stone – YouTube
All true but the corporatocracy doesn’t care about not having authority because they will just forcibly take it when it suits them. The only way to defeat the situation is to find some way of getting rid of these monsters.
“You will own nothing, and you will be happy” translates to “You will believe that you have no right to private property, and your rights won’t be respected. However, at least you will be alive – but miserable.”
Judges don’t make law – i.e. the ERROR of legal positivism. Especially when such “law” is the result of bribery and money laundering. Unjust statutes aren’t the only form of “law.” So are illegitimate “judge orders.”
There is no absolute right to private property. This error works in favor of the Jews. They say that they have the “right” to buy with their Monopoly “money” as much land as they want – and then refuse to sell it. However, they will be willing to rent – e.g. price gouge – it in perpetuity.
It is likely that rent is the sin of usury. A person is profiting off of the necessity for other persons who want/need to use his property. However, I doubt that it is lawful for a person to own an unlimited amount of property which can be used by others. Certainly, it isn’t just that a person be “empowered” to exclude and/or extort those who seek to use his property.