Legendary voluntaryist and libertarian Larken Rose has created a deep and brilliant feature film, Jones Plantation. It will make you think.
How free are you if you are constantly being persuaded that you are free?
Shownotes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb8Rj5xkDPk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8Rsc7lrxA8
https://jonesplantationfilm.com/
https://thefreedomarticles.com/political-authority-no-real-basis/
https://www.amazon.com/Break-Your-Chains-Conspiracy-Presenting-ebook/dp/B0CBJSXPHP/
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Break Your Chains, the book series Controversial Truths Revealed (Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and 40 Incredible Real Life Alien Abductee and Contactee Experiences) and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Rumble and Odysee/LBRY.
16 Comments
Saw this article on sott.net this morning. One man’s journey getting off the plantation.
https://www.sott.net/article/484009-My-Journey-From-Illness-And-Despair-Towards-Truth-And-God
I think it is all about asking God for understanding. My experience is that He brings it our way, maybe not what we think is in a timely manner, but in His.
Also, off subject, here is article on 9-11 with a view I hadn’t seen before.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/08/no_author/the-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center-on-september-11-2001-the-devils-trick/
Thanks for links.
Continued due to spambot.
6. There are no duties with regards to business relationships (e.g. between individuals and businesses) outside of invidious discrimination along the lines of “race,” religion, sex, etc. As such, what is understood as “freedom of contract” is sacred.
7. People only have the right to life if they are useful to those in power.
8. Law isn’t essentially linked to morality.
9. Our rights come from the government.
10. Government doesn’t have a duty to enforce the law (e.g. investigate and arrest) in all cases.
To be continued …
Continued
11. Morality is relative and changes over time.
12. Justice is subjective.
13. One never should upset anyone, even unintentionally.
14. There isn’t such a thing as free will.
15. Measures for the prevention of discomfort override the rights of others.
To be continued.
Spambot continuation
16. There isn’t any unjust law.
17. Human nature is changeable.
18. Technology needn’t be used in a moral fashion when it comes to issues related to human reproduction.
19. Businesses ought not to be regulated by law except to correct issues related to workplace or consumer safety.
20. Non-human animals have rights.
To be continued …
Spam continuation.
26. Secrecy is very important in government.
27. Law is written.
28. The administration of justice needn’t depend on the circumstances of the parties “outside court.” It must remain committed to treating everyone – equally slow – in accordance with “the rules.”
29. The political majority isn’t morally incorrect.
30. Revolution is unjust. All correction of government mustn’t involve unofficial force.
TBC
What is discussed in this video are called errors. Errors are things that a person thinks honestly that are true, and that aren’t. Lies are known falsities conveyed with an intent to deceive.
The “thought patterns” are erroneous beliefs perpetrated via either errors of their own or lies by Satan, the Jews, non-true-Catholics, and ignorant true Catholics. I will attempt to comprehensively list those that I can.
1. Mental illness exists.
2. Race exists.
3. Religion is irrelevant to politics.
4. Prior censorship is always wrong.
5. Business property is the same as non-business property.
To be continued (i.e. spambot) …
cont.
21. Suffering can’t accomplish good.
22. Judicial precedents aren’t erroneous.
23. Government doesn’t ultimately serve individuals, but rather institutions.
24. Children don’t have rights with regards to the marriage of their biological/adoptive parents.
25. What supremely matters with regards to the care of children is that they don’t starve or die. Their spiritual well-being and optimal health aren’t important.
TBC.
Continued
31. Employees and prospective employees have no natural rights. Any employee rights come from being a part of a union.
32. The purpose of a business is profit maximization.
33. Media mustn’t take sides, offer opinions, and/or have an agenda. It must remain neutral. And the morality regarding complicity with sin ought not to be considered with regards to its publication(s).
34. Media shouldn’t be held to account for suppressed information of great public importance.
35. Advertising is good.
TBC
Continued.
36. Lobbying isn’t criminal.
37. Feminism is – or at least was at some point – good.
38.Government has the power to dissolve the marital bond, and give license for the remarriage of the former spouses before either of them has died.
39. Licensing is always lawful.
40. There is no legal liability for speaking the truth – no matter what wrong is done by the same.
The key here is the nature of authority. Authority must be obeyed, but illegitimate authority need not. There are times such as the “command/law” to worship idols when illegitimate authority MUST NOT be “obeyed.”
Note that illegitimate authority isn’t always a matter of the position, in itself, (e.g. if President Biden actually hadn’t won in 2020. He would be considered a usurper.), but the nature of the requirement for the alleged obedience. “Abuse of a person’s prima facie authoritative position” is a good description for illegitimate authority.
I am not aware of an antonym to the word obedience in English. Obedience is a virtue while blind obedience is likely a vice against the virtue of prudence.
Also, what is very important to understand is that legitimate authority always has the right to command, but it needn’t always do so. It can request. As such, it is the “clear legitimate command” which must be obeyed.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FYI my computer (Apple laptop) was restarted by likely Mossad malware while working on this comment. They likely don’t like my comments on this webpage.
Want to learn how to express your OWN LAW?
http://thesovereignsway.com
Law comes from God. Strictly speaking, the natural law is defined by reasoning concerning human nature, and doesn’t depend on even the existence of God. But, of course, God created man.
The link you posted appears to be Gnostic (i.e. heretical). However, it might be worth investigating.
This is along the lines of my previous comments concerning errors.
One of the most important insights that I have come across (in a book), and which I hope will benefit those who might see it is the true meaning of the maxim “ignorance of the law is no excuse.” This is typically taken to mean that a person who has no way of knowing or no realistic way to have found out or understood what written law he has broken shouldn’t be held to account in court.
The actual meaning is that assuming that a person who is alleged to have broken the law knew that what he did was wrong, then the fact that he didn’t know that the state threatened to punish him (e.g. with the written law) for his behavior ought not to prevent it from doing so. As such, this correct meaning works especially well with unwritten law. This is how a person can be held to account with regards to what a lawyer might call a case of first impression regarding a new tort.
However, given that the state isn’t authorized to attempt to punish all wrongs, there can still be the issue of government overreach.
Basically, if a person knew that he did something morally wrong, then the state can – barring a jurisdictional conflict – punish him.
I am not sure how much longer that I will be living, or have my liberty. The noose caused by sin – e.g. corruption – is drawing tight. Any person who takes a strong enough stand against evil in an evil world can be assured to end up in jail, murdered, or both.
St. John the Baptist was murdered by beheading for speaking out against those in power.
As a PSA FYI, there is one kind of civil case that will certainly move comparatively fast, and for which there is only one, given “solution” pay-to-stay and that is …
EVICTIONS.
There are literally “laws” in cities that say that a person has a right to quickly clear up any negative consequences of an eviction action, if they can pay. A person has a natural right to housing – regardless of ability to pay – but it seems that in error pretty much every single person will agree that a person only has a right to that which he can pay for, unless he is completely incapacitated.
Think about it. All it takes is to really upset an employer and you will be BLACKLISTED due to pretty much universal AFAIK civil conspiracy of tortious interference with business relations. No attorney will help you, and the corrupt courts ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QeD1uUgmKw ) will side with the businesses. Just because this particular EVIL doesn’t affect very many doesn’t mean that it isn’t an issue. Any injustice is an issue which should be the concern of everyone.
Imagine a state of affairs where every store that sold food refused to do business with you, even if you had money. Eventually you would starve unless you managed to become a successful thief, was thrown in jail, or managed to get by on charity. That is an analogy to blacklisting.
I am not sure how much longer that I will be living, or have my liberty. The noose caused by sin – e.g. corruption – is drawing tight. Any person who takes a strong enough stand against evil in an evil world can be assured to end up in jail, murdered, or both.
St. John the Baptist was murdered by beheading for speaking out against those in power.
As a PSA FYI, there is one kind of civil case that will certainly move comparatively fast, and for which there is only one, given “solution” – pay-to-stay – and that is …
EVICTIONS.
There are literally “laws” in cities that say that a person has a right to quickly clear up any negative consequences of an eviction action, if they can pay. A person has a natural right to housing – regardless of ability to pay – but it seems that in error pretty much every single person will agree that a person only has a right to that which he can pay for, unless he is completely incapacitated.
Think about it. All it takes is to really upset an employer and you will be BLACKLISTED due to pretty much universal AFAIK civil conspiracy of tortious interference with business relations. No attorney will help you, and the corrupt courts ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QeD1uUgmKw ) will side with the businesses. Just because this particular EVIL doesn’t affect very many doesn’t mean that it isn’t an issue. Any injustice is an issue which should be the concern of everyone.
Imagine a state of affairs where every store that sold food refused to do business with you, even if you had money. Eventually you would starve unless you managed to become a successful thief, was thrown in jail, or managed to get by on charity. That is an analogy to blacklisting.
Another truth worth publicizing regarding an error is that rent, as currently conceived, is usury. Usury is the profiting off of any loan. Traditionally, it usury has been considered with regards to money – i.e. interest.
While rent is technically usury, that doesn’t mean that one isn’t required to pay the landlord anything. What is being paid for is maintenance, repairs, improvements, security, and property taxes. For that matter, it would be possible for the landlord to offer cleaning services, provided that it was desired and he was trusted.
As such, the issue here is the one-sideness of the landlord-tenant bargain, and the likely very excessive profits.
Usury is a sin against justice, so that means that restitution is required.
All economic value is created through labor. What a person is paying for with regards to any product or service is the time and materials that it took to bring the product to be purchased to market. There isn’t any inherent labor associated with the rental of property.