Good Hearts, Fooled Minds: Top 4 Fallacies of the Hijacked Environmental Movement


The Hijacked Environmental Movement: are you getting green-washed?

The hijacked environmental movement

is a symptom of the current general, collective state of humanity: good hearted but ignorant. Kind hearted but hoodwinked. Many people in the environmental movement are in it for the right reasons: they see the ongoing poisoning and destruction of the planet by corporations, and are determined to defend and speak out for the Earth. Yet, in spite of their good intentions, they have unwittingly allowed themselves to be channeled in a direction that is not really going to help the Earth. They are unintentionally supporting the very forces that are responsible for the pillaging of it.

By continuing to push notions that carbon dioxide is a poison, that global warming exists and mankind is responsible for it, that we need a worldwide carbon tax and that we require Agenda 21-style global governance, these people are unknowingly promoting the New World Order program – and unwittingly placing elite controllers in power who don’t care about the environment and view it merely as a resource to be exploited. It has even gotten to the point where those resisting climate change (another Rothschild-Rockefeller creation) are being treated like criminal extremists – there have even been calls in the US by climate scientists for Obama to prosecute them!

Welcome to Planet Earth. If your opinion diverges too much from the mainstream, you could get locked up for thinking wrongly.

With the current focus being on the 2015 UN Summit, the hackneyed buzzword of sustainability is being thrown around like there’s no tomorrow. In this context, it’s worth revisiting how the environmental movement came to be so hijacked and co-opted.

The hijacked environmental movement comes from the Report From Iron Mountain.

Basis for the Hijack: Conspiracy Reports from The Iron Mountain and The Club of Rome

The basis for the hijacked environment movement lies with formerly secret military reports, and one of the elite Round Table groups that run the world: the Club of Rome. I wonder if those who believe in AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) or Manmade Global Warming have any idea that the elite came up with the idea of using mankind itself as the global threat against which we are all supposed to gather behind a One World Government? The 1966 Report from the Iron Mountain was commissioned by JFK and considered by LBJ as too dangerous to reveal to the public at the time when it was completed. This excerpt from it discusses how a Global Government could function without war, and suggests the threat could instead be environmental pollution:

“It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power.”

The Hijacked Environmental Movement refers to the fact that the Green Movement has been infiltrated & overtaken to steer the world toward Global Governance.

The Club of Rome is one of 6 groups that are close to the center of the Rhodesian Round Table (ultimately funded by Rothschild) which also includes The Bilderberg Group, the CFR, the RIIA, the UN and The Trilateral Commission. The Club of Rome’s 1991 document entitled The First Global Revolution? contains this passage:

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together … all these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

The current environmental movement we see today has been seeded, or at least hijacked, a long time ago. Let’s take a look at the top 4 fallacies the NWO conspirators have managed to get naive greenies to believe.

If only the hijacked environmental movement could see the obvious: carbon dioxide is a nutrient, not a poison.

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #1: Carbon Dioxide is a Poison

Let’s start with the basics: carbon dioxide (CO2) is a nutrient, not a poison. We breathe out carbon dioxide every breath, but we also take some of it in on the inbreath. According to the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), we are therefore poisoning ourselves every breath! Think about it – if CO2 were really a poison, why does it help plants grow so much? Why is it a key part of the fundamental equation of biology: sugar + oxygen = carbon dioxide + water + heat? How is it that those in the environmental movement are ignorant of basic biology?

As the website states, the more CO2 around, the better plants grow:

“In Idso and Idso’s (1994) analysis of soil nutrient limitations, the percentage growth enhancement due to a 300-ppm rise in the air’s CO2 content actually did exhibit a slight (but statistically non-significant) decline, dropping from 51% to 45% when nutrients went from non-growth-limiting to limiting in a group of 70 experiments.  But when the atmospheric CO2 enrichment was 600 ppm, this slight negative trend reversed itself, going from a CO2-induced growth stimulation of 43% when nutrients were present in abundance to a 52% enhancement when their supply was sub-optimal.  And for a 1200-ppm increase in atmospheric CO2, the percentage growth enhancement jumped from 60% when the soil nutrient supply was adequate to 207% when it was less-than-adequate.”

It’s a simple equation: the more CO2 you have, the more the plants like it, and the faster they will grow.

The demonization of carbon dioxide is not about helping the environment. The NWO idea has always been to attach the worsening condition of the environment to an individual’s energy usage – and even his or her breathing – so as to introduce a carbon tax. The Government literally wants to tax you for breathing – for merely being alive!


The hijacked environmental movement may not know it, but manmade global warming is the hottest hoax around!

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #2: The Manmade Global Warming Hoax

AGW or manmade global warming has been exposed as a giant scam. It still remains an open question whether the world is warming or cooling, given all the fakery and fudging of data, such as ClimateGate, where hackers found that scientists at the UK’s East Anglia University had deliberately distorted the figures. (See the work of Ian Plimer, Christopher Monckton and others in exposing this.) That is why the term global warming got changed to climate change – this way, no matter what happens with the weather, the IPCC can say the climate is changing. Climate change is a slick truism – you can’t argue against it. Of course the climate is changing. When has it not changed?

The great documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle years ago exposed the lies behind the very political climate change agenda. More than 1,000 dissenting scientists from around the globe have challenged the manmade global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and shredded its credibility. Further, climate change, whether we are causing it or not, is not necessarily bad; in some cases studies have suggested it is responsible for re-greening parts of the world and changing lives for the better.

The hijacked environmental movement doesn’t see that the focus on carbon is to prepare us for a global carbon tax.

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #3: The Carbon Tax and Global Governance as Eco-Solutions

As pointed out above, all this focus on carbon is for one reason: taxation. The whole scheme to get people and corporations fixated on their carbon footprint – rather than how much actual benefit or harm they are doing the environment – is to pave the way for more taxation and centralization of power. To have a worldwide carbon tax, of course, you need a One World Government to enforce and collect it. The UN, ICLEI and its other subdivisions are constantly talking about global governance for this very reason.

For further information on this topic, check out George Hunt’s work in exposing how Evelyn Rothschild and David Rockefeller were cooking up the cap-and-trade scheme in the 1980s. He was at some of the meetings where the carbon tax was being discussed!

The Hijacked Environmental Movement Fallacy #4: Overpopulation

Mahatma Gandhi once said: “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need, but not every man’s greed.” There is no doubt that rising populations can put a strain on resources, yet where is the proof that the Earth cannot support 7 billion people? Or 9 billion people? Is it really population that is the problem here, or is it rather self-centered greed and destructive environmental practices and technologies?

The “green” concern with overpopulation has at its foundation eugenics.

We can accept the world’s rising population not as a threat or a reason to justify killing (which goes by the euphemism of depopulation), but rather as a challenge. It can propel us into living more from the heart, to having more compassion for those less well off than us, to doing a better job of sharing, of distributing resources equitably. It can stimulate us into better modes of efficiency. Could the rising population help a critical mass of people awake to the truth of free energy, and the fact that free energy or over unity devices already exist which provide practically unlimited energy for free or very cheaply?

It has been known in many countries for a long time that as you increase education, you decrease population, naturally. There is no need for stealth sterilization programs, introducing contraceptives through vaccines or other depopulation murder programs. When people gain a higher education, they organically choose to have less kids. If the conspirators really cared about the planet’s population, why not use their money to help everyone access better education? The answer is, of course, that they don’t.

Underpinning the propaganda of overpopulation is eugenics. It’s the idea that some humans are superior to others, and that some humans don’t deserve to be here. This is really the philosophical and spiritual basis of the hijacking. As they have confessed, the conspirators in their delusions (see Prince Philip above) view the rest of the population as a virus that must be rid from the planet. Yet, the real virus is the fear mindset that runs the show in the brains of the elite controllers.

The real problem with the environment is the fact we’re trashing it – period.

The Real Problem Isn’t Climate Change or Carbon

The real problem with the environment isn’t climate change or carbon. It’s that we as a collective species are trashing and degrading it. We are in serious danger of ruining our environment to such an extent that it will no longer be able to support an oxygen-breathing species like ours. We spill oil in our oceans and rivers. We kill off species faster than we can even classify them. We make substances which don’t biodegrade and end up in giant landfills. We cut down forests without taking enough care to replace them. We use an economic system which incentivizes planned obsolescence and economically encourages us to throw things away rather than repair them. We let maniacal men rule out-of-control Governments that spray toxic barium, aluminum and strontium chemtrails all over the world – and get away with it.

What does any of this have to do with climate change or carbon? These 2 terms are a huge distraction and a deliberate way to trick people who genuinely care for the environment.

As David Icke says, we need streetwise spirituality and activism.

Solution: Get Informed Before You Demonstrate

Do you deeply care for the environment? Great! Then do your research first before joining any protests. Oppose fracking, GMOs, corporate welfare to military companies (the Pentagon is the biggest polluter on planet) and geoengineering, which is spraying poison all over the world. Last year, in September 2014, around 400,000 people turned up in New York for the People’s Climate March – but what is the point of this activism if it gets diverted?

As David Icke says, we need streetwise spirituality. We need to have our hearts in the right places, but also put our thinking caps on, otherwise we will easily by led astray by tricksters. Only once the leaders of the environmental movement have their hearts and brains in alignment can we effect real change on the ecosystems of Planet Earth.


Want the latest commentary and analysis on Conspiracy, Natural Health, Sovereignty, Consciousness and more? Sign up for free blog updates!

Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the global conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.














Sven September 24, 2015 - 12:32 am

Thank you for upgrading my views !
Only cheats like Al Gore or “professor” Tim Flannery are profiting on this agendas.
Now, it is also hijacked by Barack Hussein Obama for his own purpose.
Do NOT trust to those swindlers !

new illuminati September 24, 2015 - 9:00 am

It’s terrible that you further mislead people into thinking the biosphere isn’t being destabilised by human-generated pollution. You are spreading disinformation designed by rich men to protect their fossil fool monopolies while claiming environmentalists are ignorant.
Only the TRULY ignorant believe we aren’t injecting destabilising energy into the biosphere (not just the atmosphere) via greenhouse gases; you don’t seem to mention methane and have little scientific understanding of the properties of carbon and the molecules it forms.
Plant growth vs animal poisoning isn’t mentioned – if you think C)2 is safe or good try breathing a few percent of it for a while.
You need to ask a simple question – who benefits from these lies? Do you really believe environmentalists PROFIT from trying to save the biosphere – and their children – while you defend the notorious Big Oil and King Coal monopolists? Your assertions will be taken on board by all kinds of ignoramuses and touted by right wing polluters as evidence they are on the right track. If this doesn’t worry you, then investigate the provenance of all those assertions and you’ll find the so-called ‘scientists’ they quote are well paid reprehensible shills. Those supposed ‘1,000 dissenting scientists’ are NOT climate scientists (many are not even scientists), and tens of thousands hold the opposite view to the miniscule thousand you claim say warming is not occurring – which you’d know if you’d really investigated this issue instead of simply quoting lies put out by fossil fuel propagandists.
All these problems are interlinked – clmate change denial is the greatest promoter for the most egregious power mongers on the planet. Please see before deleting this comment!
It’s a shame that so-called ‘alternative’ sites do the work of the most egregious straight people!

Makia Freeman September 24, 2015 - 9:10 pm

Reading through your comment, I don’t believe you’ve read or understood my article in its entirety. I oppose the polluters of the world, most definitely including Big Oil, the owners of whom are the very same Illuminati bloodline NWO families I have been exposing for years (Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc.).

My point is that focusing just on carbon or climate change has nothing or little to do with GENUINELY caring for and saving the environment. It’s a distraction and a trick that leads to the carbon tax and Global Governance. The environment is getting destroyed regardless of whether man causes climate change, and regardless of how much carbon is being produced in whatever form.

J. Lee September 24, 2015 - 9:03 pm

How can you possibly speak on this most important subject and only mention Srategic Aerosol Management (SRM) or Strategic Aerosol Geoengineering (SAG) in a passing comment once? Until one factors in this man made climate change in our skies for the past 40 years, all talk about whether, etc. is meaningless and nonsensical discussion. End of Story. Also see “Full Spectrum Dominance” and “Weather Force Multiplier 2025, Owning the Skies” to better understand how sophisticated weather modication is and has been.

Makia Freeman September 24, 2015 - 9:57 pm

Fair point – the impact of geoengineering/SRM is huge. However the point of the article was not geoengineering (which I have focused on elsewhere) – the point was to show how the green movement has been hijacked. Investigations into geoengineering are very important but beyond the scope of this particular article.

BDBinc September 28, 2015 - 3:47 am

The scary thing with the agenda 2030’s 17 pseudo environmentalists , pro vaccination, privatization and GMO goals (as you said) is that some people believe the UN’s doublespeak.
Have you heard how UN goal #5 was used for an attempt at internet control (censorship)
the Washington Post “On Thursday, the organization’s Broadband Commission for Digital Development released a damning “world-wide wake-up call” on what it calls “cyber VAWG,” or violence against women and girls. The report concludes that online harassment is “a problem of pandemic proportion” — which, nbd, we’ve all heard before.
But the United Nations then goes on to propose radical, proactive policy changes for both governments and social networks, effectively projecting a whole new vision for how the Internet could work. ”
“Empowering woman and girls” by the mega corporation’s having full control of the internet and by censoring and regulating them on the internet!
As I said its all doublespeak so reverse it .
With the banking cabal’s imposed “austerity” adding a Carbon tax and Wall st costs of trading CO2 means 1) its a plan for creating mass poverty.

John October 2, 2015 - 2:22 am

Good article. You mentioned the “Rhodesian Round Table”, which some readers might not recognize.

The “Rhodes-Milner Group” included Cecil Rhodes, Lord Alfred Milner, William Stead, Nathaniel Rothschild, and others. The group later spawned the Round Table Society, the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka Chatham House), and the Council on Foreign Relations.

For more, see “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Prof. Carroll Quigley

John October 2, 2015 - 2:23 am

Good article. You mentioned the “Rhodesian Round Table”, which some readers might not recognize.

The “Rhodes-Milner Group” included Cecil Rhodes, Lord Alfred Milner, Nathaniel Rothschild, and others. The group later spawned the Round Table Society, the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka Chatham House), and the Council on Foreign Relations.

For more, see “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Prof. Carroll Quigley

Deborah O'Grady December 18, 2015 - 2:10 pm

A very well informed article thank you. I find it extremely frustrating that we are shot down in flames for even suggesting that Global warming is the biggest scam in history – you only have to follow the money – Or noticing our blue sky is now a murky black/grey toxic soup. I have just withdrawn my donation (which I doubled recently) and support to Greenpeace who support Global Warming and believe Climate engineering doesn’t exist – those chemtrails that stay in the sky for hours blocking the sun which leaves us in the dark for weeks at a time – are just Contrails – Really Greenpeace. Also having just discovered that AVAAZ is also NWO, I would agree whole heartedly that YES the environmental movement has most definitely been hijacked and I for one was fooled.

mary Michaels February 13, 2016 - 1:27 pm

Good except I disagree on fracking. frack here, frack now.

Jo Jo July 1, 2017 - 3:22 am

If that is your position (which I totally agree is your right to express) I’d suggest you may still have more to learn?

Despina Arzouman September 22, 2016 - 4:23 pm

When I was at Whole Foods just yesterday, a young man came over and was (politely) hammering at me to donate to Greenpeace. I basically told him I’d been donating to organizations (such as these) since before he was born — and I’ve stopped supporting because I only see things GETTING WORSE. His jaw dropped. TODAY…. THIS ARTICLE SHOWS UP. PRETTY GOOD TIMING.

Post Comment