Obama Syria 2013, Bush Iraq 2003: See Any Difference?
Obama Syria 2013 is Bush Iraq 2003.
Do you see any substantial difference? Bush and US administration, with the support of Blair and his British administration, went around the whole world telling us that Saddam had WMDs (Weapons of Mass Destruction). That turned out to be a massive whopper. It was a bold-faced lie used as a cover story to launch an attack on Iraq. As General Wesley Clark had previously admitted to the media, the plan to attack Iraq was hatched much earlier, as part of a overall US scheme to control the Middle East (see his admission here). The Obama Syria 2013 story, like the Obama Libya 2011 story, is following the same script: invent an excuse to attack a sovereign nation (that has geopolitical significance to the Anglo-American New World Order and is currently without a Rothschild bank) by claiming the legitimately elected government are killing their own people.
WMDs, chemical weapons, whatever … let’s attack first and investigate later
The clinical psychopaths running this world must be stopped and held accountable, and it is heartening to see the world as a whole become more politically awakened and refuse to buy into the mendacity spewing forth from the mouths of Obama, Kerry, Cameron and their ilk. Without any proof whatsoever, US Secretary of State Kerry accused Assad of using chemical weapons against his people. This, despite the fact that:
- Syrian defense officials made panicked calls amongst themselves demanding answers (intercepted by Mossad and passed to the US);
- A Malaysian hacker released hacked emails from Britam, a British weapons company, showing an exchange between administrators there, one of whom claimed he had been offered enormous sums to provide a CW (chemical weapon) to Homs in Syria. He also wrote that the idea was backed by Washington, and that the CW had to “look like” something from Assad’s arsenal (to blame it on him);
- The US, alongside the UK, France and Israel, have been steadily supplying the Syrian rebels with weapons for months to destabilize and overthrow Assad.
Given the history of false flag attacks carried out by the US and it allies, I strongly suspect they are feeding them with chemical weapons and making it look like Assad was responsible.
The Obama Syria 2013 campaign has already been shot down by the British Parliament
Thankfully, sanity has prevailed in the UK, where Cameron’s desire to go to war with Syria was shot down and defeated. It is unclear whether Congress will do the same to Obama, or whether he will even go to Congress to ask; he has already shown his disregard for both national US law and international law in his pre-emptive strikes. The Rothschild-run Western powers are incredibly arrogant in thinking that Syria could just be like another Iraq or Libya. Iran, China and Russia (all of whom have strong, advanced militaries) have all declared they are not going to stand back and just let the US and allies invade. If Obama does decide to launch a war there, we could very possibly be looking at WW3. Let’s hope the peace-loving people of America and Britain can keep their psychopathic leaders in check enough to prevent the “Obama Syria 2013” war plan from becoming a brutal reality.
Want to keep informed on the latest and greatest news and analysis on the New World Order, Natural Health, Sovereignty and more? Sign up for free blog updates!