Elon Musk, owner of Space X and subsidiary Starlink, has billion dollar contracts with the US Intelligence Complex to do surveillance on behalf of the USG – and Israel, of course. Is Starlink being deployed to Yemen to spy on the Houthis?
Shownotes:
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles. He is author of the books Break Your Chains and , the book series Controversial Truths Revealed (Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and 40 Incredible Real Life Alien Abductee and Contactee Experiences) and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Rumble, BitChute and Odysee.
1 Comment
No doubt Starlink could be used to spy on the Houthis and for the U,S and Israel but that doesn't mean Musk supports his tech being used that way. He didn't support the Ukrainians using Starlink against the Russians and said he would block Ukraine from using it unless they stopped. According to various reports they stopped.
Having HFA Musk's perceptions are already different from neurotypical people so even if his tech is being used for spying would he see it that way? It seems unlikely. So if he doesn't see it that way it can't be said that he supports his tech being used for spying. It's an important point whether he supports it or not but there's no way we can know for sure short of getting an interview with him and asking him.
He cried when told that many people are faced with the choice of heating their homes or eating. No doubt Shapiro told him at Auschwitz that millions of Jews were starved, worked and gassed to death and no doubt Musk cried at that too. As for the US government loans he has had he has said in various interviews that they have been paid back, or very nearly so, and before the expiry date. So should we assume he is lying? Maybe he is telling the truth when he says he wants to connect up even the remotest villages so they have access to the outside world. This could be his perception but not the perception of most neurotypical people. Under these circumstances I don't see how it's possible for any neurotypical person to legitimately criticize someone with HFA who has different perceptions or assume they understand and support how their tech is being used. Many people with HFA have a strong humanitarian streak but it doesn't necessarily mean they will always be able to direct it in appropriate or effective ways.
Musk, Gates, Assange and Thunberg among others have been diagnosed with HFA. Musicians, such as David Byrne, Dave Greenfield, Jim Morrison, Bjork and director Tim Burton are believed to have/have had it. And Einstein, Darwin and even Orwell are considered to have been undiagnosed autists. With the first four could it not be a case of them being allowed to get into influential positions so their skills/talents/perceptions could be manipulated by powerful people who see their potential early on and recognize that non neurotypicals have narrower interests but greater staying power and concentration than neurotypicals|? In any case, it seems to me that the biggest danger is in the destruction of all privacy and the constant beaming down of EMFs on people's heads. It's extremely unlikely that any of these people would think about using their own tech in such ways so maybe more effort needs to be put into finding ways of eradicating those who would divert this tech into the malevolent ways they are trying to do.