Elon Musk was again using his fake Adrian Dittman alter ego. Musk has always been someone willing to use his platform to censor criticism of himself, or censor views he doesn’t like, just like most people. He doesn’t have a full commitment to the principle of free speech and Twitter/X being the digital town square when it interferes with his agendas, profit or business goals. It’s just this current issue of the H-1B Visa Program that has brought this to the surface.
Shownotes:
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles. He is author of the books Break Your Chains and , the book series Controversial Truths Revealed (Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and 40 Incredible Real Life Alien Abductee and Contactee Experiences) and lead researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Rumble, BitChute and Odysee.
3 Comments
It is clear that Musk has been brainwashed by the Zionist and globalist factions and I agree that hate speech/free speech is an oxymoron. I wonder if there was some kind of deal done between Musk and Trump that allows Musk some influence in return for suppression of Zionist criticism?
Musk sounds like he's on the verge of an autistic meltdown and it seems strange on the surface that he would think anyone would believe he is someone called Aidrian Dittman and not know he's Elon Musk, just as he did in the David Icke interview with Alex Jones. That he seems to believe his alter ego is convincing is another sign of the socially naive aspect of autism. What seems equally strange is that no one seems to call him out on it. Why does no one say to him "why are you pretending to be someone called Aidrian Ditman when we all know you're Elon Musk? Do you think we're all stupid or what?!" Surely it would be worth saying if only to see his reaction and just out of curiosity? But everyone goes along with it, even David Icke. This is really really strange.
As I've said before, being autistic Musk has different perceptions from non autistic people and autistics are generally easy to manipulate once their trust has been gained. So having a different perception Musk probably sees what he's doing as a positive thing, and if so, he cannot be classed as being evil, uncaring, without a conscience or anything else that could legitimately be said of a non autistic person doing the same things. No doubt Greta Thunberg believes she is helping the environment, Julian Assange believed he was exposing corruption and making the world a better place, Mark Zuckerberg thought he could help people around the world stay in touch, Bill Gates in his own autistic way probably thinks he's improving humanity with his vaccines and synthetic meat, Sergey Brin and Larry Page of Google no doubt thought they were adding positive things to life by inventing Google. All are autistic, all were/are basically controlled by the state. Musk is no different. But can we ascribe to any of them consiously bad intentions for the world when they have different perceptions from non autistic people? Then there is the fact that the overwhelming majority of young people opting for gender change are autistic and that a disturbingly high number of them have signed up for legally assisted suicide programs citing the reason as being the unbearable pain of being alive. Because of these things it has to be asked if autism is deliberately being created in many instances?
I also agree with Bernie Sanders' point about the H1B visas. It really is a way of replacing the American worker with cheap labor from third world countries. But he is also a hypocrite for complaining about rich people and their tax breaks when he has three luxurious houses himself, is a multi millionaire and while he backed his wife in bankrupting a small college in Vermont because they fired her after she was employed to invest their money in land which lost them millions. The lawsuit she brought against them for compensation was the final straw which forced them to close. The students were not able to get their upfront fees paid back to them when the college had to file for bankruptcy. So he and his greedy wife cost not only the college millions but the ordinary students and their parents many thousands of dollars in fees paid in advanced. So the "man of the people" is not in any position to criticize any other rich person like himself.
Hi Tempest, I wonder to what extent the reason of “autism” can be used in this situation. However, you may like this articles, which describes the left-brain dominance and right-brain deficit of the Tech Bros, arguing they are not saviors or villains but acting as they do according to their brain makeup:
https://off-guardian.org/2025/02/18/are-the-tech-bros-insane/
Hi Makia, it's an interesting article in how it shows the difference between a left hemisphere dominated brain and a right hemisphere one. For a long time it has been believed that the left hemisphere is mostly responsible for logic, scientific thinking and much less emotion, whereas the right hemisphere is where creative thought, imagination, emotion and empathy comes from. So this connects with the article's emphasis on the mechanistic interests of the people mentioned in the article. Here it even mentions many of the characteristics associated with high functioning autists:
"inability to tell what another is thinking, a lack of social intelligence, difficulty in judging non-verbal features of communication, such as tone, humor, irony, and inability to detect deceit, and difficulty understanding implicit meaning, lack of empathy, a lack of imagination, an attraction to the mechanical, a tendency to treat people and body parts as inanimate objects."
However, it does not mention autism even though at least two of those mentioned are on the autistic spectrum – Musk and Thiel. I think autism, which gives those with it different perceptions of things, does really play an important part because how can they be expected to think the same ways about things when their actual perceptions are different from non autistic people? It doesn't make sense to expect them to when they are operating with different perceptions. Here the writer offers an opinion on why they are the way they are:
"Entertain for a moment the idea that these Tech Bros are neither evil villains nor saviors. Instead, consider that they may actually believe AI technocracy would be good, but they are unable to understand the full implications of their goals because they suffer from right hemisphere deficits."
This is essentially the point I have been making all along except the writer ascribes it to a lack of ability to think on the right hemisphere of the brain whereas I am suggesting it is down to autism creating different perceptions in those affected by it. Now it's possible there is a connection between thinking predominantly on one hemisphere than another and the different perceptions involved in autism and I am no expert on it, but it could be a connection that just hasn't been made yet.
We also can't ignore the fact that most autists are quite socially naive, easily influenced and very loyal once their trust has been gained, spend a lot of their lives feeling lonely and disconnected from others and on the periphery of things because they genuinely are due to not being able to connect in the same way as non autists, and many look for radical 'solutions' such as gender change and eventually enrol on government suicide programs because it is just too painful to continue living. The figures show these things to be the case. The big difference between the 'celebrity' autists and the everyday unknown ones is that the 'celebrity' ones have a lot of money to cushion themselves from long periods of unemployment or low paid jobs that nowhere near matches their talents, the consequent poverty which comes from this and the abuse and bullying that many, even adult, autistic people experience becaause they appear odd or different from others. It is also likely that the celebrity ones are put in place to fulfill a deep state agenda which they may have no idea of but genuinely believe they are doing good in society because this is how their role has been manipulatively sold to them.