COVID denialism is now enshrined in case law in Canada. A judge denied a father custody rights due to this perspective that COVID was a hoax.
COVID denialism –
a broad term leveled at those who have seen through lies regarding the COVID scamdemic – has been enshrined in legal history and case law, at least in Canada. This is another horrendous yet sadly predictable step of the COVID agenda, which is none other than the agenda to steal your rights and freedom. MSM outlet CBC reported last week that a judge stripped a man (who remains anonymous at this stage) of his custody rights in his divorce case with his ex-wife due to his belief that COVID was a hoax, and his subsequent decision to defy social distancing and mask wearing rules. In other words, he was stripped of some of his rights due to his COVID denialism. The case was heard in late 2020 in the Ontario Superior Court, however Justice George W. King delivered the written decision at the end of January 2021, and the story was just picked up by The Free Thought Project.
Judge Considers Man’s Belief that COVID is a Hoax to be a Factor in Determining his Worthiness as a Father
I have been unable to locate the link to the original ruling, and the CBC article does not link to it, however the article reported that the judge explicitly wrote that the man’s public promotion of his opinions was affecting the health and welfare of his children:
“Ontario Superior Court Justice George W. King denied a Windsor man interim custody of his kids because the man’s fervent anti-masking beliefs means he wouldn’t take appropriate actions to keep them safe from COVID-19. The decision notes the man believes COVID-19 to be a hoax and has boasted in public about flouting health restrictions such as masking and social distancing.
“The health and welfare of the children (and by extension their principal caregiver) should not be jeopardized because of [his] public behaviour in promotion of his opinions,” he wrote.”
This is quite an astounding thing for a judge to write, since it shows how the judge has bought the official COVID narrative hook, line and sinker. The judge is saying that if you challenge the theory (i.e. brainwashing propaganda) that COVID is a highly lethal dangerous disease, that can only be contained or avoided with mandatory social distancing and masking, that therefore you are “jeopardizing” the health of your kids. Wow. It is truly shocking a judge could be so out-of-touch with scientific reality. However, it gets worse. The CBC further reported:
““I have concluded that the respondent’s behaviour is dictated by his world view. Everything else is subordinate to that view, including, but not limited to, his love for his children,” the decision by Justice King read.”
Now that is a supremely arrogant opinion. This man’s love for his children is subordinate to perspective that COVID is a hoax? WTF? I seriously doubt that is true for any parent – that any intellectual belief or world perspective would outweigh their love for their children – and even if it were, how could the judge possibly know that? Only the man himself would know. Besides, he is providing immense care for their welfare by REFUSING to put masks on his kids or allow them to be scared of ginned up COVID fear. He is proving his worth as a father by leading by example and being a good role model in showing his children that one must stand up for truth, freedom and inherent rights rather than be bullied by corrupt authorities. He would be doing great damage to the “health and welfare” of his children by forcing them to go along with the absurd, unscientific and freedom-crushing COVID dictates being foist upon the public.
Judge Blames Man for COVID Denialism When Governmental Lockdown Policies are the Real Culprit
Finally, it turns out this judicial decision will impact whether his children could get vaccinated:
“Justice King called some of what the man had posted about COVID-19 not being real as erroneous, pointing out rise in hospitalizations and deaths due to the virus as well as the effect that has had on health care providers having to delay other medical procedures because of the tax the virus has placed on the system.
“The long-term effects of the pandemic and of delayed treatments to persons with other health conditions is currently unmeasurable,” justice King wrote.
“All of this has occurred while a percentage of our population, including [the man], continue to deny the existence, significance and/or impact of COVID-19.”
The ruling includes giving the mother the power to make decisions around vaccination. But it noted the interim custody was awarded wholly within the context of the pandemic and can be revisited once it subsides.”
This is problem when people can’t distinguish between different causes. The effect of COVID on the health system and the “significance” and “impact” of COVID are all due to governmental reactions and lockdown policies not the virus itself. As I have extensively and exhaustively documented, the virus has never been isolated nor proven to exist as a purified, separate entity. Meanwhile, judges like this ‘Justice King’ character, who being part of the judicial branch is therefore part of the government, are blaming and punishing members of the public (and depriving them of their rights) for standing for the truth and not going along with the COVID Cult, when it is the government itself that is the culprit! The virus didn’t crush small businesses; the government did. The virus didn’t throw people into poverty; the government did. The virus didn’t put a strain on hospitals and the medical treatment system; the government did by mass inculcation of fear. So-called COVID denialism is not the problem; rather, the problem is when people are so programmed they can’t see beyond their noses. It is all the more dangerous when these people occupy positions of power.
And now one potential consequence of this decision is these children may end up getting vaccinated, either in general or specifically with the COVID vaccines, which are not really vaccines but gene editing tools.
This is truly a gross and outrageous betrayal of justice. May the day come soon when the people who have orchestrated and perpetuated this colossal fraud be brought to justice. Some modern Nuremburg Trials would be appropriate.
The implications of such a decision could be far-reaching if it becomes established precedent in Canada and elsewhere. This means that we could be entering an Orwellain dystopia where your unalienable, inherent, sovereign rights can be deprived based on your ideas, theories, beliefs, opinions and world perspectives. In other words, wrongthink is a crime. This case mark another stepping stone into descent for humanity. Hopefully, the pushback against the COVID Cult – led in part by 16 US states who are re-opening – can counterbalance the betrayal of justice that has happened here.
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and LBRY.
Sources:
*https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/windsor-covid-19-custody-decision-1.5937278
*https://thefreethoughtproject.com/court-removes-children-from-fathers-custody-covid-beliefs/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/10-reasons-sars-cov-2-imaginary-digital-theoretical-virus/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/do-mandatory-masks-vaccines-break-10-points-nuremburg-code/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-cult-and-the-10-stages-of-genocide/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/toxic-vaccine-adjuvants-the-top-10/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/not-a-vaccine-mrna-covid-vaccine-chemical-pathogen-device/
*https://www.aier.org/article/16-states-are-now-following-the-science/
14 Comments
…..don’t know if this person (or his legal representation) was in any position to present as compelling evidence at that time, what can now be referred to (though by FAR, not a singular item for jurisprudent consideration) the DEFINING Swiss Policy Research overview regarding masks (including a Cochrane decision which didn’t deviate from an inescapable, unanimous professional conclusion EITHER) but, when even the CDC does a comparative analysis of ALL American counties, only to conclude that a whopping 1.8% maximum number of reduction in COVID cases and yet these IDIOTS are allowed to devastate lives, we can ONLY recognize rampant intellectual corruption through so-called ‘justice’ systems worldwide – as for the mRNA jabs and casualties now eclipsing 300,000 in the UK alone (arguably, at LEAST a million total otherwise to date) those will SOON be correctly characterized as DEADLY weapons and second, first-degree MURDER (as applicable) respectively …..
https://t.co/0wp62pYucy?FbcKxbGkU2
Many of these people, like the judge, obviously have Narcissistic Personality Disorder which has morphed into megalomania. They are incapable of seeing truth because they bask in their heroic self-image constantly fed by the synchophants they surround themselves with. Truth destroys that self image, so they rationalize to suppress cognitive dissonance and retain their imagined heroism. These are intelligentsia history warns us about. Useful idiots. Indoctrinated, not educated. Whenever they gain power, mass killings occur.
I’m not surprised one bit. With the world governments’ legislative and executive branches firmly under the control of the global elite, why would we believe the judicial branches could be independent? Oh, I think they throw out inconsequential decisions here and there to give the impression they’re impartial. But make no mistake who’s at the helm. When the rubber hits the road, judges are going to do as they’re instructed.
*PLEASE ditch Disqus!
Of course judges are not independent. If there are any of those out there, their time is limited. Judges, soldiers, police, teachers, priests and tv reporters are all important appointed gatekeepers, there to serve as a buffer between the elites and their servants and the abused people. The abusers enjoy abusing us and don’t mind if we know – they get a thrill from it – but really don’t want to deal with actual consequences for their actions, hence the need for gatekeepers.
Interestingly, Noam Chomsky writes and talks about the first and most important targets for indoctrination (propaganda). Those targets are the cultural managers. They are those who in turn influence the thinking of others who they have authority over.
You have appointed (paid, aware to some extent of their role as gatekeepers) and self-appointed gatekeepers. Anyone can be a self-appointed gatekeeper. All you have to do is identify power and ally yourself with it. And you show your loyalty by hindering, in small or big (and in between) ways, those with the ‘wrong’ political views. The security guard in the liquor store here in Toronto who told me to pull my mask up above my nose is an example of a self-appointed gatekeeper – if he didn’t have to do that.
The “pandemic” either never was of a unique virus, or it existed but has since died out since this scientist recently analyzed 1500 covid cases and only found flu viruses, no modified coronavirus. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/297dddf3d31523f8e8124bc61772ac185047b818cddda4027cda2b7d8bc58726.png
The thing about case “law” is this: precedent is always persuasive, and is never binding (AFAIK). This means that judicial independence always exists. What happens is that it is assumed that the decisions of a higher court or a past decision is correct. However, there is nothing “set in stone” (AFAIK), and it is possible to “disobey” precedent.
I have issues with the whole system. If a judge makes a mistake, he should be removed from office. There should be no tolerance with regards to miscarriages of justice. Ignorance shouldn’t be a problem because these judges are lawyers and have been – presumably – highly trained.
Corruption whether in the form of malice or bribery should definitely NEVER be tolerated. Such behavior should be a capital offense.
One’s rights never technically disappear. What happens is that according to circumstances they may be temporarily overridden by another’s rights. The typical example of this is that a poor person can morally appropriate what he needs to survive (even by violence) – even if he can’t pay at the time.
There is no such thing as a sovereign right. Those in authority have the ability and duty to punish immoral behavior, but it is not the case that every person is his own “sovereign.”
Of course, one must have a proper understanding of rights. The basic criteria which can be used to “find” rights is that a person doesn’t ever have a right to do a wrong (It appears that this particular quotation after “that” came from Socrates). Then a person can look at morality as taught by the true Catholic Church (not the “church” of Antipope Francis, but the one which was public before the “election” of Antipope John XXIII) to derive one’s rights.
An example of such a derivation regards the rights of a child. Given that fornication is wrong, one can see that a child has an inalienable natural right to be conceived by a man and a woman married to each other. Even though the child doesn’t exist yet, the nature of the act as naturally tending to potentially produce the effect of conception gives the possible child rights against which the behavior of his possible parents must be regulated.
A person could be punished with regards to his erroneous religious views, but not when “science” is involved.
Notice it was a father who was denied. Had it been the mother, I suspect the ruling would have been different. Communists cannot control future generations of children if fathers still exist in the Family. Women have to first be brought under the complete control of the State.
You can count the number of actual communists, and capitalists, on one hand. You’ve been indoctrinated. Shake it off.
Thanks for the report. I’ll use it in my next blog post. I don’t think that The Free Thought Project tells the truth about covid 19. Regardless, Makia points out what is important about it.
There are quite a number of Corona viruses – [no denial about that] – the antibodies were already part of our immune system – revealed by incorrectly applying the Polymerase Chain Reaction for something that it was never intended for then subsequently and deliberately exaggerating DNA as”infected” when all that was revealed was already there.
They can keep this going every year with the flu.
Makia Freeman has published many articles revealing that the Corona virus has never been proven to exist. Not isolated. Not sequenced. Not proven contagious. Nothing. I encourage you to check out his archives.
One of the biggest hurdles at the moment is changing the minds of those who have already bought into the official version of this casedemic – nothing can change their mind they’re unable to digest or admit that they’ve been deceived. [in a way they are needed to push back against the Covid fraud.
I have no trouble finding good articles and podcasts on this topic – Patrick Henningsen from 21 Century wire ranks extremely high on my list – A future podcast with him and Makia Freeman would be interesting [ both are pretty much on the same page]
Naomi Wolf on Biden’s Unconstitutional Push for ‘Vaccine Passports’ [21 Centurywire]
Earlier this week I watched a short video of a young man who had put up a table and chair near a beach at Byron Bay with a sign to debate him on Covid – No one did – everyone thought that it was a hoax [the locals in the area are pretty ”woke”]
Only days after watching that video the entire region was ordered into lockdown – The famous and hugely popular Bluesfest was cancelled – shop staff were ordered to start wearing facial masks – they must keep the fear up to force the agenda through.
The best way to complement this article is by posting the following link.
Read it! – understand it! – download it and adapt to meet local criteria.
https://thecrowhouse.com/Documents/Estoppel%20Notice.pdf