The following 11 COVID assumptions are based on fear and ignorance, not evidence. Operation Coronavirus is a battle of perception.
COVID assumptions –
the assumptions people make about COVID, how dangerous it is, how it spreads and what we need to do to stop it – are running rampant, running far more wildly than the supposed virus SARS-CoV2 itself. The coldly calculated campaign of propaganda surrounding this ‘pandemic’ has achieved its aim. Besieged with a slew of contradictory information coming from all angles, people in general have succumbed to confusion. Some have given up trying to understand the situation and found it is just easier to obey official directives, even if it means giving up long-held rights. Below is a list of commonly held COVID assumptions which, if you believe them, will make you much more likely to submit to the robotic, insane and abnormal conditions of the New Normal – screening, testing, contact tracing, monitoring, surveillance, mask-wearing, social distancing, quarantine and isolation, with mandatory vaccination and microchipping to come.
Assumption 1: The Method of Counting COVID Deaths is Sensible and Accurate
A grand assumption of the COVID plandemic is that the numbers are real and accurate, especially the death toll. Yet, nothing could be further from the truth. We have had confirmation after confirmation after confirmation (in nations all over the world) that authorities are counting the deaths in a way that makes no sense. Well, it makes no sense if you want to be sensible or accurate, but it makes perfect sense if you are trying to artificially inflate the numbers and create the impression of a pandemic where there is none. The sleight of hand is achieved by counting those who died with the virus as dying from the virus. This one trick alone is responsible for vastly skewing the numbers and turning the ‘official’ death count into a meaningless farce devoid of any practical value.
Assumption 2: The PCR Test for COVID is Accurate
As I covered in previous articles, the PCR test (Polymerase Chain Reaction) was invented by scientist Kary Mullis as a manufacturing technique (since it can able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times), not as a diagnostic tool. COVID or SARS-CoV2 fails Koch’s postulates. The virus which shut the world down has still to this day never been isolated, purified and re-injected, or in other words, has never been 100% proven to exist, nor 100% proven to be the cause of the disease. When used to determine the cause of a disease, the PCR test has many flaws:
1. There is no gold standard to which to compare its results (COVID fails Koch’s postulates);
2. It detects and amplifies genetic code (RNA sequences) but offers no proof these RNA sequences are of viral origin;
3. The PCR is testing for a specific RNA sequence not the full viral genome, so even if it accurately detects that RNA sequence, there is no proof that RNA sequence is from SARS-CoV-2, as it could be from another virus, microorganism or even part of your own human gene sequence;
4. PCR is not detecting a virus per se, but rather a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left, because the PCR method amplifies the tiniest fraction of the viral genetic material. The virus may be deactivated or dead, but the PCR test won’t tell you;
5. Contamination is rife with PCR and any errors are magnified many times over;
6. It generates many false positive results;
7. The PCR test can give a completely opposite result (positive or negative) depending upon the number of cycles or amplifications that are used, which is ultimately arbitrarily chosen. For some diseases, if you lower the number of cycles to 35, it can make everyone appear negative, while if you increase them to above 35, it can make everyone appear positive;
8. Many patients switch back and forth from positive to negative when taking the PCR test on subsequent days; and
9. Even a positive result does not guarantee the discovered ‘virus’ is the cause of the disease!
In summary, the PCR test doesn’t identify or isolate viruses, doesn’t provide RNA sequences of pathogens, offers no baseline for comparison with patient samples, and cannot determine an infected from an uninfected sample. That is staggeringly useless! Here is a quote from the article COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless:
“Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity” and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available. As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:
If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”
Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”“
Here is the admission about the PCR test by the CDC and FDA:
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms …this test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”
Accurate would be about the last word I would use to describe COVID PCR testing, yet it is currently the standard test worldwide for COVID. Another magnificent example of many COVID assumptions. Go figure.
Assumption 3: The Antibody Test for COVID is Accurate
If you realized by reading the last section that the COVID PCR tests are flawed and meaningless, get ready for more absurdity with the COVID antibody tests. They are also known as serology or serological tests. As I covered in the article COVID Antibody Tests: Here Comes More Trickery and Fakery, there are numerous reasons why the antibody tests don’t really work and can be interpreted any way you want:
1. Old blood samples contain COVID antibodies, so if a test finds antibodies, they may have been there for years or decades. There is no way to tell if they were recently acquired;
2. Like the COVID PCR test, they generate many false positive results;
3. They test for antibodies which may not even be specific for COVID;
4. Antibodies don’t actually prove immunity, since there are people who fight off disease with little or no antibodies, and conversely, there are those with high antibody titers or counts, but who still get sick; and
5. The results can be interpreted any way you want. The presence of antibodies could mean you’re safe and immune to future COVID waves, or conversely, it could mean you’re dangerous (sick and infected right now). It’s all about the interpretation.
Hhmmm … all these COVID assumptions are not exactly reassuring, are they?
Assumption 4: The COVID Case Count is Rising
Someone skeptical of the alternative view I am painting here may ask at this point: well if COVID is not that dangerous, how come cases keep rising? The answer is simple: because there is more testing. The more we test, the more cases we will find, because this ‘virus’ (really an RNA sequence) is far more widespread than we have been told, and there are far more asymptomatic people than we have been told (which shows it’s not that dangerous). As discussed in previous articles, there is really no proof that people didn’t have this particular RNA sequence for years or decades before the test, so the test results are quite meaningless.
That aside, a general rule of thumb is that wherever there are people trying to gain power, there will be fraud, and COVID testing is no exception. It has been exposed that tens of thousands of coronavirus tests have been double counted (in the UK, but probably happening in many places). This article explains that the “discrepancy is in large part explained by the practice of counting saliva and nasal samples for the same individual twice.” Additionally, the COVID tests are using the PCR method as discussed above in COVID Assumption 3, which has many flaws, including the flaw of results flipping back and forth depending on the number of cycles, as this previously quoted article states:
” … it is hardly surprising that there are several papers illustrating irrational test results. For example, already in February the health authority in China’s Guangdong province reported that people have fully recovered from illness blamed on COVID-19, started to test “negative,” and then tested “positive” again.
A month later, a paper published in the Journal of Medical Virology showed that 29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3 to 6 test results that flipped between “negative”, “positive” and “dubious”.
A third example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back to “positive” at least once, and up to five times in one patient.
Even Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, conceded in February that the PCR tests are “only 30 to 50 per cent accurate”; while Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO’s coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22, 2020, saying that:
“It has been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases.” ”
Assumption 5: Thermal Imaging/Screening for COVID is Effective
Taking people’s temperature by pointing a gun at their head is blatant conditioning. It sends the subliminal message that the State is all powerful and can aim a gun-like device at your head, and you are powerless to do anything but submit. On a practical level, taking people’s temperatures has no effect in stopping viral spread. Even if someone has an elevated temperature, what does that mean? There is a natural variation in human body temperatures; everyone operates at a slightly different temperature. Besides, even if your temperature is elevated, that could be because you were just exercising, running to catch a flight, just had an angry conversation with someone, just got the phone after a stressful call, had to discipline a disobedient child, etc. Think about all the things that make you stressed and irritated, or raise your blood pressure, which could lead to an elevated temperature!
In this way it is similar to the antibody test; it can show a result, but the result can be interpreted in so many ways that it renders the result pointless in terms of science (although there is a very much a point in terms of control).
Assumption 6: Asymptomatic People Can Spread the Disease
One particular piece of propaganda hammered in hard to people’s brains which is still doing great damage is the idea that anyone could be a carrier and could therefore infect anyone else. This has the effect of making people anxious, scared and even paranoid in just going about their daily life. However the idea that asymptomatic people can spread the disease is not something to worry about. This Chinese study A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers published in May 2020 exposed 455 subjects to asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV2. None of the 455 were infected!
WHO (World Health Organization) official Dr. Maria van Kerkhove was reported by MSM CNBC saying the following last month in June (though she later backtracked her comments):
““From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said at a news briefing from the United Nations agency’s Geneva headquarters. “It’s very rare.””
Assumption 7: Making Schools Adopt Insanely Restrictive Measures Will Stop COVID Spread
Of the many COVID assumptions floating around, these next two are based on the idea that children are a significant source of COVID spread. They are not! The figures from WorldOMeter state that children aged 0-17 years have 0.02-0.06% share of world COVID deaths, which is essentially zero. Meanwhile, CDC stats show that “among 149,082 (99.6%) cases for which patient age was known, 2,572 (1.7%) occurred in children aged <18 years” which is likewise a tiny fraction. With this in mind, why on Earth would the CDC issue these draconian guidelines (pictured above and also found at this link in full) for American schoolchildren, if not to condition and dehumanize them?
Assumption 8: It’s a Good Idea for Government to Take Abduct Kids from COVID-Positive Parents
Governmental abduction of children using COVID as a pretext has begun. This article from June 17th 2020 reports how the “LA County Dept. of Children and Family Services (DCFS) recommended that the court remove [a] child from their physical custody after the parent tested positive for COVID-19. This is a non-offending parent. The judge ruled in favor of DCFS and detained.”
Let that sink in for a minute. The State stole a child from his/her parents just because a parent showed a COVID-positive result on a (deeply flawed) test! Can anyone spell T-Y-R-A-N-N-Y? This is the outcome of the sinister and oxymoronic warning given by WHO official Michael Ryan in March, that people would be removed from their families in a “safe and dignified” way. Ryan said:
“In some senses, transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units. Now we need to go and look in families to find those people who may be sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner.”
Mercola.com reports that the CDC is recommending newborns be separated at birth from their parents for COVID testing.
How bad does it have to get before people wake up to what is happening?
Assumption 9: Social Distancing is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence
Another of the baseless COVID assumptions is that all this social distancing or physical distancing is backed by solid scientific evidence. It’s not. Whether it’s 6 feet, 1.5 meters or 2 meters, the virus seems to be able to jump different distances depending upon what country it is in. The article There is no scientific evidence to support the disastrous two-metre rule states:
“The influential Lancet review provided evidence from 172 studies in support of physical distancing of one metre or more. This might sound impressive, but all the studies were retrospective and suffer from biases that undermine the reliability of their findings.”
Meanwhile UK governmental advisor Robert Dingwall said:
“We cannot sustain [social distancing measures] without causing serious damage to society, to the economy and to the physical and mental health of the population …I think it will be much harder to get compliance with some of the measures that really do not have an evidence base. I mean the two-metre rule was conjured up out of nowhere … Well, there is a certain amount of scientific evidence for a one-metre distance which comes out of indoor studies in clinical and experimental settings. There’s never been a scientific basis for two metres, it’s kind of a rule of thumb. But it’s not like there is a whole kind of rigorous scientific literature that it is founded upon.”
Of course, the assumption that social distancing works is based on the underlying assumption that there is a distinct and isolated virus SARS-CoV2 which is contagious and is the sole cause of all the disease – which has not been proven.
Assumption 10: Mask Wearing for Healthy People is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence
The penultimate assumption for today is the wonderful topic of masks, or face diapers and face nappies as many have started calling them. One of the COVID assumptions that many are still clinging to is that it is ‘respectful’ to wear masks because masks protect healthy individuals from getting sick from viruses. This is patently false. As covered in the previous article Unmasking the Truth: Studies Show Dehumanizing Masks Weaken You and Don’t Protect You, masks are designed for surgeons or people who are already sick, not for healthy people. They stop sick people spreading a disease through large respiratory droplets; they do nothing to protect well people. In fact, they restrict oxygen flow leading to under-oxygenation (hypoxia), which in turns leads to fatigue, weakness and a lower immunity. With a lower immunity comes … more susceptibility to disease. As I previously wrote, the masks many people are wearing – homemade from cloth – are a joke if you think they will stop a virus which is measured in nanometers (nanometer = 10–9 meters, or 0.000000001 meters). They won’t stop a virus but they will assuredly become a hotbed for microbes to develop due to the warm and humid conditions. For the scientifically minded, here’s what Dr. Russell Blaylock had to say:
“The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.”
Assumption 11: We Live in a World of Indiscriminate Killer Viruses
“Since June 1954, the death of tissue and cells in a test tube has been regarded as proof for the existence of a virus … according to scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out … These control experiments have never been carried out by official science to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with allegedly “infected” material.
In other words, the cells die of starvation and poisoning (since they are separated from energy and nutrients from the body, and since toxic antibiotics are injected into the cell culture), not from being infected by a virus. This great video presentation entitled Viral Misconceptions: The True Nature of Viruses is well worth watching. It outlines many stunning truths about the nature of viruses, such as:
– Viruses are created from within your cells; they do not come from outside the body
– They arise as a result of systemic toxicity, not because the body has been invaded by an external threat
– Viruses dissolve toxic matter when body tissue is too toxic for living bacteria or microbes to feed upon without being poisoned to death. Without viruses, the human body couldn’t achieve homeostasis and sustain itself in the face of systemic toxicity
– Viruses are very specific. They dissolve specific tissues in the body. They do this with the assistance of antibodies
– The more toxicity you have in your body, the more viral activity you will have
– The only vector transmission of a virus is through blood transfusion or vaccines; otherwise, viruses cannot infect you by jumping from one body to another
– Viruses are discriminatory by nature, made by the body for a specific purpose. They are not indiscriminate killers
– The RT-PCR test (PCR test for short) observes genetic material left over by the virus, not the virus itself (see assumption 2)
Conclusion: Time to Question all Your COVID Assumptions
The good news is that these are assumptions not facts. When you look closely, you will realize the entire official narrative on COVID is a house of cards built on sand. It cannot stand up to close scrutiny. This knowledge is the key to remaining sane and free in a COVID-crazed and brainwashed world. Spread the word. Evidence, information and knowledge will dispel assumptions and ignorance.
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and Parler.
Sources:
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/9GWhQ4v9H53E/
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5f_6ltv7oI
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fic2dlKlhw
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5dWbxwoCZI
*https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
*https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-antibody-tests-here-comes-more-trickery-fakery/
*https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/tens-thousands-coronavirus-tests-have-double-counted-officials/
*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219423/
*https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html
*https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
*https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6914e4.htm
*https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-childcare/schools.html
*https://parentalrights.org/it-finally-happened-child-taken-due-to-covid-19/
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/CMPsWxDDTwMo/
*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/06/09/newborns-and-coronavirus.aspx
*https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/15/no-scientific-evidence-support-disastrous-two-metre-rule/
*https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/25/two-metre-social-distancing-rule-conjured-nowhere-professor-claims-12609448/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/unmasking-the-truth-masks-weaken-dont-protect-you/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-down-virus-rabbit-hole-question-everything/
*https://davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Paper-Virus-Lanka-002.pdf
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWYQS3LFlE
*https://medium.com/@vernunftundrichtigkeit/coronavirus-why-everyone-was-wrong-fce6db5ba809 (Beda Stadler)
26 Comments
exactly. the hoax is exposed. except for the brainwashed propagandized sheeple,who actually believe a corrupt govt suddenly cares about their health. the year 2020 will go down in history as the year humans lost all ability to think rationally.
PROVE THERE IS A “RESURGENCE” WHEN THERE NEVER WAS A SURGE FROM DAY ONE. FUDGING NUMBERS IS HOW THE GOVT HOODWINKS THE GULLIBLE. POSITIVE TESTS DO NOT EQUAL “CASES” DO SOME THINKING.
I think they are messing with the numbers again and changing definitions, so probable/possible cases of the hoax are counted as actual cases…this is worth a read:
EXPLOSIVE – About All These “New” Positive COVID Cases – State Health Departments Manipulating Data, Changing Definitions..
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/07/02/explosive-about-all-these-new-positive-covid-cases-state-health-departments-manipulating-data-changing-definitions/
Hi Makia,
I am pointing you to existing research that backs up what you are saying. This was originally from a guide published by Childrens Health Defense. It has the following title, “LOCKDOWN LUNACY: The Thinking Person’s Guide”. Here is an example in relation to asymptomatic carriers transmitting the disease.
1. There was an extensive contact study published on May 13 in Respiratory Medicine, titled, “A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers.”. The researchers wanted to find out whether this woman, with a COVID-19 infection but no symptoms, had infected anyone else, so they chose to look at every single contact they could identify within the previous 5 days prior to her positive test. Of the 455 contacts who they identified and were exposed to the asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carrier became the subjects of our research. They were divided into three groups: 35 patients, 196 family members and 224 hospital staffs. We extracted their epidemiological information, clinical records, auxiliary examination results and therapeutic schedules. The result was of all the 455 contacts none had the SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Assumption 12: The Authorities are Sincerely Looking Out for Our Best Interests
Continuing with this assumption… Admittedly they do get their signals crossed now and then. Then there’s politics which always generates confusion. Of course negligence often plays a factor. And they might even be wrong occasionally. After all, they are human.
That is how my mask-wearing, fear-the-virus friends think. And I don’t see their irresponsible, conspiracy-nut friend ever getting them to think otherwise. (I could show them evidence like this article all day long, without impact.) As long as these friends of mine make up the majority, I don’t see this ongoing deception ending.
Lynn, this should be assumption #1! Most people have been mind-controlled into believing that government and any/all authority figure knows better than them and, as you say, has their best interests in mind. Nope. These are illegitimate bands of criminals who mind-control the masses, extort them of their hard-earned labor, then use the money to line their own pockets while funding agendas to poison us, dehumanize us, and keep tightening the screws. (Confession: I woke up to this realization in the last year.)
Yup. The challenge becomes once one starts waking up to all the deception, it’s difficult to find anything they say or do that’s not a deception.
Just when I think I’ve heard everything, another lie or hoax pops into my view. It’s gotten to the point where I just automatically assume whatever they say is a lie. It’s a lot easier that way, LOL!
Yes, it is easier, LOL! Sad but true that we live in an inverted, corrupted world. But the veil is lifted for those who would care to see the truth exposed in living color.
Hi Makia,
I am pointing you to existing research that backs up what you are saying. This was originally from a guide published by Childrens Health Defense. It has the following title, “LOCKDOWN LUNACY: The Thinking Person’s Guide”. Here is an example in relation to asymptomatic carriers transmitting the disease.
1. There was an extensive contact study published on May 13 in Respiratory Medicine, titled, “A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers.”. The researchers wanted to find out whether this woman, with a COVID-19 infection but no symptoms, had infected anyone else, so they chose to look at every single contact they could identify within the previous 5 days prior to her positive test. Of the 455 contacts who they identified and were exposed to the asymptomatic COVID-19 virus carrier became the subjects of our research. They were divided into three groups: 35 patients, 196 family members and 224 hospital staffs. We extracted their epidemiological information, clinical records, auxiliary examination results and therapeutic schedules. The result was of all the 455 contacts none had the SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Thanks! I had read that.
I have now updated the article with it.
Jay, your stats make me wonder what the ‘experts’ would claim the Rnaught, or R sub zero transmissibility factor would be for this data set, with the goal of seeking a < 1 Rnaught. That fractional number would forecast a rapidly depleted population of hosts that would become infected, eventually leading to extinction of the threat of the much hyped Covid 19. HOWEVER, the distorted and hyped 'increase in number of case infections' as proffered by the MSM all day long (7/6/20), doesn't tell the whole story; the tests that are administrated in various locations are biased for various reasons AND there are significant false positives AND negatives whichever test type is administered (PCR or sero). Also, virtually NO MSM reporting on the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR); it's 1/10th to 2/10 of ONE percent, depending on the depth and breadth of the collection of data. Let's just let that sink in for a moment... It troubles me that the MSM never attempts to cover the Covid 19 story with ANY healthy skepticism, as that would weaken its 'dump Trump' campaign, served up daily, at whatever cost or damage by the MSM and its acolytes to society that their orchestrated effort causes. After all, it's all his fault, right? If one watches and listens carefully, one can deduce which side the 'experts' the MSM trots out are on. Their evidence/opinion will support the policy mandates that have trampled on our Constitutional rights.
Hi Phlogistan,
The only real measures that you can look at is hospital visits to determine who has the same symptoms and the overall deaths and the Herd Immunity Threshold.
The PCR test is useless because they don’t have a golden copy of the virus to determine if someone has Covid-19 or not. The seropositive test is useless because as Dr Stoian Alexov said in an article in the Off-guardian.org, no pathologist has ever identified an anti body for SARS-COV2. So all these people can have either the seasonal flu or cold or something else. Right now we don’t know. And when the so called experts start talking about people are having different symptoms from before it is BS. They could be dealing with a cold or whereas before it was the flu or vice versa.
All you can do is look at places like Sweden where there was no lockdown. The Herd Immunity threshold for whatever people were ill with this year was around 0.2 which is consistent with having between 5000-6000 deaths (Sweden had 5200) and Swedes now have herd immunity! If Sweden had done what it promised which was to protect the old and those with preexisting conditions, the number of deaths would be even lower! The only city that did implement the national strategy of protecting the old and those with preexisting conditions was Malmo. The rest of the country basically failed.
So what do we have?
No identified virus.
No identified antibody.
And they have been associating every death with Covid-19 whatever that may be.
That is why I said all you can do is look at the deaths, hospital or doctors visits and at what point did deaths peak to give you an idea of when the Herd Immunity Threshold (HIT) was reached for the population for the season. So looking at Sweden, we can say HIT of 0.2 for this seasonal virus which would mean that places that did a late lockdown like New York and London already have herd immunity. Which seems to be the case.
Thanks, Jay, for the detail. Stay strong against the MSM propaganda; I wish more Americans were as curious as you.
You’re welcome. Same to you. All the best!
There has to be some overlap in the fact that some say the viruses come from inside of our bodies and the other fact, that science has millions of publications in the last hundreds of years about ‘external’ viruses, and in particular in recent years the entire science in genetics is focusing on using viruses as ‘gene drives’, to change the human genome. NIH libraries have genetic codes for every of the viruses ‘out’ there. Where do they come from? One has to distinguish between what’s really completely artificial and what’s not, i.e. nature, our bodies.. Why so many get sick or die when receiving vaccines??? Just look at the GMO’s, they are REAL and they do damage entirely our bodies, alone by reprogramming the gut microbiome. And it starts with CLONING, ARTIFICIAL LIFE MADE IN A LAB!!!! Closing eyes to the existence of that source, genetics labs, which redefine the entire nature HAS TO GET INTO peoples minds, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
The perpetrators of this foul con game were on the ropes, their suppression of facts and data were failing so they played the race card, they allowed the video of George Floyd to go viral (when they were censoring and suppressing information about the bogus SARS-CoV-2 infection figures, lies and death count etc) to high-jack the news cycle to get the spotlight off of their scam and fake science.(Neil Ferguson a biological mathematician in the employ of Bill Gates at the Imperial College in London has been wrong on every “pandemic model” from SARS, MERS, H1N1, etc) https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/08/so-the-real-scandal-is-why-did-anyone-ever-listen-to-this-guy/.
COVID 19 is also a huge cover for the implosion and looting of the financial system by Wall Street so entities like BlackStone and the Fed can buy up massive amounts of stock and bonds and will end up owning almost everything similar to what was done during the Great Depression.
This has been a scam since day one and now they are ramping up for the “second wave” of fear mongering and lock downs until their killer vaccines (Bill Gates is a eugenicist who will make billions off of them) are ready for market. Don’t fall for the flim-flam and the okey-doke!!
Gates vaccines are the Mark of the Beast, don’t take it, read the ID2020 agenda, and the tattoo with the patch.
Junious, you nailed it. I’m a ‘conspiracy theorist’ in SF and likely wouldn’t find one thinking person here who would at least consider your thesis, as I do.
There are a few there but you have to seek them out. The masses are so brainwashed, zombified and lobotomized we realistically shouldn’t expect them to respond in ways that reflect our best interests. We are not programmed that way. Pass on what you know, plant the seed it will grow. Stay strong!
“No one has died from the coronavirus”: Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association
https://www.sott.net/article/437511-No-one-has-died-from-the-coronavirus-Important-revelations-shared-by-Dr-Stoian-Alexov-President-of-the-Bulgarian-Pathology-Association
Covid-19 Hoax Implodes! Texas Exposes NIH/CDC Artificially Inflating Numbers
https://banned.video/watch?id=5efbb80a672706002f389cd6
Amanda, I clicked on your link and discovered that the video discussing this has been banned, as identified in the link address; by whom? why, our overlords, of course. What country do we now live in?
SNOWFLAKE: “Where’s your MASK?!!”
ME; “Damned if I know…. last I saw of it I was tossing it onto your mama’s night stand, as I embarked upon my journey to The Land of No Fucks to Give, THE go-to spot for anybody contemplating bangin’ that ‘ole tosspot. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4432f367228accfe6698d3744dff6b412ac6e9c618defc9113505ad00d3f3a5d.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/80c21ee50dbc34ef51ea49d02c479825008f98a6269c21adcc328ff5d65c46a1.jpg?w=800&h=213
In the words of the late soil scientist, William Albrecht, PhD: “It’s not the overpowering invader we must fear but the weakened condition of the victim.” Evidence left by Albrecht, Weston Price, Francis Pottenger, Jr. and Andre Voisin supports this statement, time after time. Of course this evidence remains hidden in unopened books. I am in agreement with your stance on the putative virus. Sadly, no one seems to be concerned about the weakened condition of the victim and how to both prevent it and, if is has not progressed to far, how to reverse it.