9/11 13th Anniversary: 13 Questions for the Government


On this 9/11 13th Anniversary, let’s awaken to the truth of 9/11. These 13 questions for the US Government highlight the deception of the official story.

As we reach the 9/11 13th anniversary,

it is worth casting our attention back to that horrific event, and continuing to shine light on the utter nonsense that is the official story of 9/11. Although it is now 2014 and the 9/11 13th anniversary, there are some promising signs that people are beginning to awaken to the truth of the biggest false flag operation ever on US soil. Recently the TV channel C-SPAN (which reaches around 100 million cable and satellite households in America) hosted a show with Richard Gage, founder of “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth”; and the organization ReThink 9/11 is displaying a massive digital billboard in New York City showing life-size video footage of WTC 7’s symmetrical destruction.

So on this 13th anniversary of 9/11, I have 13 key questions for the US Government.

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #1

How did a giant, whole steel-and-concrete building (WTC 7) fall in on inself in perfect, controlled-demolition fashion, when it was not hit by any plane?

Many people still do not realize that an entire building collapsed on 9/11 that was never hit by a plane. Building 7 or WTC7 fell around 5pm that day in a neat, pancake-like fashion. Around 2000 of architects and engineers (Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) have gone on the record to state that NIST’s “office fire” theory defies the laws of physics and could not have caused the fall. They claim that the fall exactly resembled a controlled demolition.

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #2

How did the Twin Towers collapse so perfectly?

An analysis of the collapse of the twin towers shows that their destruction proceeded through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration, that there was an improbable symmetry of debris distribution, and an extremely rapid onset of destruction. How can the laws of physics as we know them explain this? Could this fall ever be replicated?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #3

If planes really downed the WTC, why were traces of the explosive nano-thermite found in the debris?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #4

Why, as affirmed by eyewitnesses, were there bombs in the buildings?

Why did eyewitness firefighters on the scene say they heard bombs in the building, especially in the basement and on the lower levels? Why do office workers say the lobby was blown up if the planes hit the towers above the 50th floors?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #5

What about first responder testimony?

Why does first responder William Rodriguez swear he saw, felt, experienced and heard bombs in the basement when he rescued people?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #6

Why did Larry Silverstein say “pull it!”?

If 9/11 wasn’t planned, why did owner of the towers Larry Silverstein take out insurance a few months beforehand for the very type of event that happened? Why did he say “pull it!” (a slang reference meaning to begin a controlled demolition)?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #7

How did the solid steel frames get turned to dust?

How did the building frames get pulverized? Was some kind of free energy weaponry used, based on free-energy Tesla/Hutchison technology?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #8

Why did the Bushes trade and meet with the Bin Ladens?

If Bin Laden was such a scary terrorist, why did the Bush family trade with him for decades, including the sale of weapons? Why did representatives from both families meet the day before 9/11?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #9

Why did some people have foreknowledge of the event?

If 9/11 was really carried out by 19 Arabs with boxcutters, and the US Government knew nothing, why was there foreknowledge of the event? Why did BBC report Building 7 had fallen 30 minutes before it actually did? Why did San Francisco mayor Willie Brown and author Salmon Rushdie both get calls beforehand telling them not to board planes going to NYC?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #10

Why did NORAD stand down?

Why did NORAD, charged with the duty of defending American skies that day and in general, stand down at key times instead of scrambling fighter jets to intercept the planes? Why did Cheney give the order to stand down?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #11

Why was there a drill on 9/11, at the exact same time, at the exact same place, for the exact same scenario?

A convenient drill at same time: like other false flag operations, there was a war game drill on at the same time in the same place for the same scenario (hijacked planes going in the WTC) during 9/11, so key personnel were confused about what was mock and what was real. What are the chances of a real event exactly mimicking a drill just coincidentally happening to occur at the same time?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #12

Why was the video footage doctored with fake planes?

Why did the Zionist mainstream media use CGIs (computer generated images) to insert fake airplanes into the video shot that could not possibly have been there?

9/11 13th Anniversary Question #13

What is Israel’s role in 9/11?

Israel is the private country of the richest family in the world – the Rothschilds. Israel (and their military arm Mossad) has been behind many of the world’s atrocities ever since their founding in 1948. They have repeatedly attacked their neighbors and their friends alike (such as the Israeli false flag attack on the USS Liberty in 1967). They have bought, bribed and blackmailed US politicians for decades. There is evidence (courtesy of Jim Stone) they installed nuclear devices at Fukushima to trigger that the Fukushima disaster of 2011.

Why were Israelis (Mossad agents) arrested in NY on 911, filming, documenting and celebrating the event with foreknowledge? Why does the FBI have documents on Urban Moving Systems (the Israeli Mossad front)? Why were Israeli Mossad agents driving around New York on 9/11 with explosives, highlighted maps, fake passports, boxcutters and cash? Why did some Israelis admit on Live TV they were sent to document the attack? Why did ZIM, an Israeli shipping company 49% owned by the Israeli Government, vacate its 10,000 square-foot office in the north tower only days before 9/11 (by doing so, ZIM had to pay a $50,000 penalty for prematurely breaking its lease)?

Many, many, many questions …

Want to keep informed on the latest and greatest news and analysis on the New World Order, Natural Health, Sovereignty and more? Sign up for free blog updates!

Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.


Patrick Simoniello September 11, 2014 - 12:34 am

There has never been a question in my mind that this was a false flag operation and our government Bush Cheney administration were complicit if not directly responsible. Science, math, and Physics don’t lie. I was a foreman on that project for more than 5 years and was very familiar with the structure and those main core columns, Its not even possible to happen as we were told. Free fall speed?? What a joke, they insult our intelligence. Maybe after the Bushes Cheney’s and all the players are dead we might get some answers, not a minute sooner. This is not going away.

Emmanuel Goldstein September 11, 2014 - 2:08 pm

“When an honest man, honestly mistaken, comes face-to-face with undeniable and irrefutable truth, he is faced with

one of two choices, he must either cease being mistaken or cease being honest.” – Amicus Solo (Latan for “a lone


If Richard Gage is using AE911Ttruth’s funds to buy Dr. Wood’s book, and Richard Gage is suppressing Dr. Wood’s work,

one must conclude that the prime directive of AE911Truth is to suppress the evidence. Mr. Gage cannot refute the

overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Wood’s book but only misrepresent it (i.e.

promote disinformation about it). Humanity has awoken. If you are worthy and willing to open your eyes to the truth,

read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood.

Richard Gage and other Liars for 9/11 Truth

Image of check from Richard Gage for Dr. Judy Wood Book

AE911Truth vs Dr. Judy Wood


Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Part I Summary, 1.) mission statement

Our mission is to research, compile, and disseminate (some) scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the

three World Trade Center skyscrapers, (not all 7, just 3 of the buildings) calling for a truly open and independent

investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice. (Except Dr. Judy Wood)

Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Schedule A, Part II, Section A

from 2008 to 2012 AE911Truth income was $1.365 million!!!


If Mr. Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive his supporters and the American

people by claiming to present the best “scientific forensic evidence”, only to completely ignore the large sum of

scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a scientist or researcher only presented the evidence

that supports their hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered their hypothesis, they could be

stripped of their professional license or degree for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total

sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration.

Theory, speculation, and belief are not necessary to understand that a type of directed energy was used on 9/11,

rather, only detailed study of the empirical evidence from 9/11 is necessary. Situations like this are rare in

science, where there is so much empirical evidence that one can bypass theory and speculation to draw an irrefutable

conclusion from the evidence. This also helps to illustrate a major difference between Dr. Judy Wood and other 9/11

researchers, as she did not start with theory or speculation and then begin researching to see if it was consistent

with the evidence. Instead, Dr. Wood simply did what any objective, vigilant scientist would do, she gathered and

studied as much of the empirical evidence from 9/11 as possible, assembling a monumental database of verifiable

physical evidence that dwarfs the efforts of any other 9/11 “research”, including the unscientific ‘9/11 Commission

Report’. After gathering and studying all of this important evidence, Dr. Wood arrived at the only logical,

inescapable conclusion that explains all of this empirical evidence, a general category of weapon technology known as

‘directed energy weapons’ (DEW). It would be theory or speculation to go beyond that by trying to name a specific

weapon technology or location, because that is not what the evidence allows us to irrefutably conclude. This is why

the term is left as a general one, because that is the only logical, conclusive, and irrefutable conclusion that the

evidence allows us to make.

This download is the Foreword and book review of “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” by Eric Larsen, Professor Emeritus at

John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1971 – 2006 (35 years), plus the Author’s Preface.


Those of us who have read Dr. Wood’s book can give at least 10 reasons that rule out the theory by “AE911trutherd”

that welding material destroyed the WTC. How many can you list ? Hint: the bottom of page 45, the top of page 171,

the diagrams on page 81 and 84, the diagram at the bottom of page 11, and of course pages 122 to 127. The list is

endless, actually.

By reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, you know from the EVIDENCE that the Twin Towers turned to dust in mid-air never

hitting the ground.

>Bombs don’t do that.
>Thermite does not do that.
>Thermate does not do that.
>Nano-enhanced thermite does not do that.
>Nano-thermite does not do that.
>New-and-improved super-duper mini-micro-nano thermite does not do that.
>Firecrackers do not do that.
>Fire does not do that.
>Nukes do not do that.
>Megga nukes do not do that.
>Milli-nukes do not do that.
>Mini-nukes do not do that.
>Nano-nukes cannot do that.
>A wrecking ball cannot do that.
>A slingshot cannot do that.
>Missiles cannot do that.

We know this because we know those things above involve Kinetic Energy and/or Thermal Energy and we know that the

“dustification” was done without Kinetic Energy and without Thermal Energy. That is, “dustification” was not done

with high heat (Thermal Energy) nor with some form of Kinetic Energy (wrecking ball, projectile, gravity collapse).

The building was not cooked to death nor was it beaten to death. So Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEW) did not destroy the

buildings nor did Thermal Energy Weapons (TEW) destroy the buildings. But we know that Energy was Directed somehow

(and controlled within fairly precise boundaries) to cause the building to turn to dust in mid air. That is, some

kind of (cold) Directed Energy that was used as a weapon (cDEW) had to have done this. Energy was directed and

manipulated within the material such that it came apart without involving high heat (fire, welding materials such as

thermite) and without having something fly through the air and hit it (bullets, missile, bombs, wrecking ball, a

giant hammer, or many micro hammers)

If this technology can manipulate energy to do something like this, it can also be manipulated to provide us with

“free energy” (i.e. “off the grid”). Simply by looking at the cover of Dr. Wood’s book you can realize there must be

a technology that can do this. This is evidence that such technology does exist. This is evidence that a technology

capable of providing “free energy” (“off the grid”) exists. The whole world witnessed this which means the whole

world can know that “free-energy technology” exists. This realization will change the world. This is probably the

biggest reason why there is so much effort spent misrepresenting, distorting, and suppressing Dr. Wood’s research.

Those that choose to focus on hearsay, speculation, conspiracy theories, or unqualified opinions while ignoring

irrefutable factual evidence by avoiding it is what keeps a cover-up in place. Diverting the public to arguing

between the two false choices of “9/11 Truthers” verses “The Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory” while ignoring the

facts is classic perception management designed to hide and obscure the evidence. (Chanting “9/11 Was An Inside Job!”

is equivalent to chanting “Yes To Fascism!”)

Richard Gage is NOT a qualified forensic scientist. Dr. Judy Wood IS a qualified forensic scientist. AE911Truth is

calling for a new investigation. This implies an admission that they are NOT qualified to conduct such an

investigation of what happened. Otherwise, why are they calling for a new investigation instead of conducting one

themselves — unless the intention is to knowingly distract its members and others away from the new investigation

that has already been conducted? AE911Truth wants a new investigation? They already have one. It’s contained in a

book called “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” Why is AE911Truth suppressing it? AE911Truth cannot lobby Congress. They are

a 501( c )3 and are prohibited from lobbying Congress. Why didn’t AE911Truth submit their so-called “thermite

evidence” to NIST? – Oh, that’s right. It’s a federal crime to defraud the government. Why hasn’t AE911Truth filed a

Federal qui tam case? Because they haven’t blown the whistle on anything and they have no evidence and it is past

the statute of limitation. So, why didn’t they support Dr. Wood’s Federal qui tam case that was filed instead of

banning members who mentioned it? * — I guess they really didn’t want such a case to go forward. So they want

“respect and compassion for all people” except for those named “Dr. Judy Wood.”

AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to

NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say

“damage control” ? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including

putting people under oath – if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban

those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. ** Since Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth,

bought Dr. Wood’s book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use “plausible deniability” as a defense.

Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this

task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using

AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have

dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the

organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood is a teacher and promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she

does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a “truth club” to keep everyone in

lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don’t go looking for the truth.

Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so

concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through

independent thought.

The scientific method, as it came into being during the Enlightenment period, is a method of thought known as

empiricism or as the empirical method. Under the terms of empiricism, all conclusions are, must, and can be drawn

from observable evidence and from observable evidence only. Evidence must precede any and every conclusion to be

drawn from it. Then, if sound logic governs in the relationship between evidence and the conclusion drawn from it,

that conclusion will be irrefutable

Scientists, as all know or should know, proceed in their thinking not according to belief or desired outcome but

according solely and only to what the empirical evidence they have gathered, studied, and observed allows them to

conclude or makes it inevitable for them to conclude.

This is why Dr. Wood’s work is irrefutable. She only presents evidence and an analysis of that evidence. There is no

use for a theory in forensic science. Either you know something or you don’t. That is why those in charge of a cover

up don’t want people to look at the evidence in Dr. Wood’s book. Dr. Wood does not ask you to believe her. She only

wants you to believe yourself and think for yourself and look at the evidence yourself and not argue about opinions

of theories of speculation of ideasŠ That is what keeps a cover up in place. Those of us who have read Dr. Wood’s

book know this to be true.

On 9/11 over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was

reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty

caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics? The 9/11

Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Contrary to its stated objective of determining ‘why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed,’ the National Institute of

Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell. Neither

the standard view that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire nor the standard opposition view that they were

intentionally detonated by thermite explosives explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and

physics. Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on

physical evidence and scientific principles. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? provides an understandable, credible, and

photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood’s disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of

the NIST report.

Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has

research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials

characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-

material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine

physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise

involves interferometry.

She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed

papers in her areas of expertise. In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science,

image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips and a large

volume of witness testimony pertaining to the destruction of the WTC complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive

forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis

of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal qui tam case for science fraud against the contractors who

contributed to the official NIST report about the destruction of the WTC. This case was filed in the US Supreme Court

in Dec 2009. To this day, Dr. Wood’s investigation is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public


*Chapter 31. AE911 “Truth” and Other Sites Again Censor The Evidence 04 Apr 2010
AE911 – Silently Deletes A Petition Signer (pages 297 to 300) of 9/11Finding the Truth – A Compilation of Articles by

Andrew Johnson Focused around the research and evidence compiled by Dr. Judy Wood

**In Appendix C, page 238, section C, (Refined searches) of Michael Armenia’s book, “Nanomanagement:The

Disintegration of a Non-Profit Corporation”, the name “Judy Wood” is a search term used to disqualify a person’s

affiliation with AE911Truth.

Field Interference 013 AE911Truth: A Failure By Design

We reported about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) in episode 16 of our audio reports. We

worked for them as their systems administrators for almost two years. As a high-level administrator inside the

organization, I witnessed a stunning degree of mismanagement and I was privy to everything; including the stuff that

nobody was supposed to see.


Richard Gage and AE911Truth sleep in the same bed with convicted sex offenders?

Manuel (Manny) Badillo from the conference “Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of

Our Time,” held March 26, 2011



US Marine John P DiMatale speaks at Rethink911 Times Square Event 9-11-13


Wake up sheeple. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Big Brother only has as much power as you grant him.

Independent thought is powerful. After reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, Charlie Pound of the U. K.

produced the song WAKE UP THIS YOUR ALARM! Unless you enjoy being fleeced, leave the opinion herd and read Dr. Wood’s

book too. It has been over 13 years since a secret technology was used to create terror and mass murder for the sake

of imperialism and hegemony based on a fiat money system in its death throes. What are we as a people left with? A

published scientific forensic investigation that concludes a type of Directed Energy that was used as a weapon

“dustified” the World Trade Center complex and a group of shadowy people determined to suppress that evidence by any

means. This is the sad reality that we live in. Wake up!

© 2012 Music, Lyrics, & Vocals by Charlie Pound

BTW…Those who ridicule and marginalize Dr. Judy Wood are promoting the fascist police state that Edward Joseph “Ed”

Snowden is alerting us to…

Fascism Anyone?

Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of

law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against

evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not. (Remember that

fascist regimes have elections too. Covering it up with a red, white, and blue sticker doesn’t make fascism any less

despicable. When are people going to wake up and start using the “F” word?)


Makia Freeman September 11, 2014 - 7:37 pm

Thanks for your comments. Yes, I agree that Dr. Wood’s analysis is excellent. It appears that some kind of free energy/directed energy weaponry was used – which fits in with the anaylsis that fake CGI/holographic planes were used, as propounded by John Lear and others.

Ultimately however it is more important to know that 9/11 was an inside job, and to pursue those who did it, rather than get caught up in “divide and conquer” tactics over exactly how it was done.

Lokis September 11, 2014 - 3:45 pm

number seven alludes to a DEW (Direct Energy Weapon) – this remains a red herring advocated by loons buying into Judith Woods’ sophomoric sophistry. Easy to dismiss this “Independence Day” weaponry by simply taking it the logical conclusion – why not employ such sci-fi systems against the many enemies of Amerika? – Baghdad – Damascus – San Francisco….keep up the good work though – hope to live to see the perps reap the whirlwind.

Makia Freeman September 11, 2014 - 7:40 pm

Such directed energy weaponry exists. May be a red herring, but I think not. As far as I can tell, I think Dr. Wood shows impressive evidence that the steel frames (and much debris) was pulverized in a way other explosives could not do. Ultimately however it is more important to know that 9/11 was an inside job, and to pursue those who did it, rather than get caught up in “divide and conquer” tactics over exactly how it was done.

stats2.trenet.ee October 16, 2015 - 8:05 pm

I have recently started a website, the information you offer on this website has helped
me greatly. Thanks for all of your time & work.

Post Comment